From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: dchinner@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.cz,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org, glommer@openvz.org,
glommer@gmail.com, vdavydov@parallels.com,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH v13 09/16] fs: consolidate {nr,free}_cached_objects args in shrink_control
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:05:50 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43660b83b58531ccf4d45f626283484441441943.1386571280.git.vdavydov@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1386571280.git.vdavydov@parallels.com>
We are going to make the FS shrinker memcg-aware. To achieve that, we
will have to pass the memcg to scan to the nr_cached_objects and
free_cached_objects VFS methods, which currently take only the NUMA node
to scan. Since the shrink_control structure already holds the node, and
the memcg to scan will be added to it as we introduce memcg-aware
vmscan, let us consolidate the methods' arguments in this structure to
keep things clean.
Thanks to David Chinner for the tip.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/super.c | 8 +++-----
fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 6 +++---
include/linux/fs.h | 6 ++++--
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index a039dba..8f9a81b 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
return SHRINK_STOP;
if (sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects)
- fs_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb, sc->nid);
+ fs_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb, sc);
inodes = list_lru_count(&sb->s_inode_lru, sc);
dentries = list_lru_count(&sb->s_dentry_lru, sc);
@@ -96,8 +96,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
if (fs_objects) {
fs_objects = mult_frac(sc->nr_to_scan, fs_objects,
total_objects);
- freed += sb->s_op->free_cached_objects(sb, fs_objects,
- sc->nid);
+ freed += sb->s_op->free_cached_objects(sb, sc, fs_objects);
}
drop_super(sb);
@@ -116,8 +115,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
return 0;
if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects)
- total_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb,
- sc->nid);
+ total_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb, sc);
total_objects += list_lru_count(&sb->s_dentry_lru, sc);
total_objects += list_lru_count(&sb->s_inode_lru, sc);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index f317488..06d155d 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -1524,7 +1524,7 @@ xfs_fs_mount(
static long
xfs_fs_nr_cached_objects(
struct super_block *sb,
- int nid)
+ struct shrink_control *sc)
{
return xfs_reclaim_inodes_count(XFS_M(sb));
}
@@ -1532,8 +1532,8 @@ xfs_fs_nr_cached_objects(
static long
xfs_fs_free_cached_objects(
struct super_block *sb,
- long nr_to_scan,
- int nid)
+ struct shrink_control *sc,
+ long nr_to_scan)
{
return xfs_reclaim_inodes_nr(XFS_M(sb), nr_to_scan);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 121f11f..b367d54 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1619,8 +1619,10 @@ struct super_operations {
ssize_t (*quota_write)(struct super_block *, int, const char *, size_t, loff_t);
#endif
int (*bdev_try_to_free_page)(struct super_block*, struct page*, gfp_t);
- long (*nr_cached_objects)(struct super_block *, int);
- long (*free_cached_objects)(struct super_block *, long, int);
+ long (*nr_cached_objects)(struct super_block *,
+ struct shrink_control *);
+ long (*free_cached_objects)(struct super_block *,
+ struct shrink_control *, long);
};
/*
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-09 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-09 8:05 [PATCH v13 00/16] kmemcg shrinkers Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 01/16] memcg: make cache index determination more robust Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 02/16] memcg: consolidate callers of memcg_cache_id Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 03/16] memcg: move initialization to memcg creation Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 04/16] memcg: move memcg_caches_array_size() function Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10 8:04 ` Glauber Costa
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 05/16] vmscan: move call to shrink_slab() to shrink_zones() Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10 8:10 ` Glauber Costa
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 06/16] vmscan: remove shrink_control arg from do_try_to_free_pages() Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 07/16] vmscan: call NUMA-unaware shrinkers irrespective of nodemask Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 08/16] mm: list_lru: require shrink_control in count, walk functions Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10 1:36 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-09 8:05 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2013-12-10 1:38 ` [PATCH v13 09/16] fs: consolidate {nr,free}_cached_objects args in shrink_control Dave Chinner
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 10/16] vmscan: shrink slab on memcg pressure Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10 2:11 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 11/16] mm: list_lru: add per-memcg lists Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10 5:00 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-10 10:05 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-12 1:40 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-12 9:50 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-12 20:24 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-14 20:03 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-12 20:48 ` Glauber Costa
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 12/16] fs: mark list_lru based shrinkers memcg aware Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10 4:17 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-11 11:08 ` Steven Whitehouse
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 13/16] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10 4:18 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-10 11:50 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10 12:38 ` Glauber Costa
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 14/16] vmpressure: in-kernel notifications Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10 8:12 ` Glauber Costa
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 15/16] memcg: reap dead memcgs upon global memory pressure Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v13 16/16] memcg: flush memcg items upon memcg destruction Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10 8:02 ` [PATCH v13 00/16] kmemcg shrinkers Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43660b83b58531ccf4d45f626283484441441943.1386571280.git.vdavydov@parallels.com \
--to=vdavydov@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=glommer@openvz.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox