linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: munmap extremely slow even with untouched mapping.
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:19:48 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4365E1B4.4050409@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4365DF9A.5040101@yahoo.com.au>

Nick Piggin wrote:

> The address based work estimate for unmapping (for lockbreak) is and
> always was horribly inefficient for sparse mappings. The problem is most
> simply explained with an example:
> 
> If we find a pgd is clear, we still have to call into unmap_page_range
> PGDIR_SIZE / ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE times, each time checking the clear pgd, in
> order to progress the working address to the next pgd.
> 
> The fundamental way to solve the problem is to keep track of the end address
> we've processed and pass it back to the higher layers.
> 
> From: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
> 
> Modification to completely get away from address based work estimate and
> instead use an abstract count, with a very small cost for empty entries as
> opposed to present pages.
> 
> On 2.6.14-git2, ppc64, and CONFIG_PREEMPT=y, mapping and unmapping 1TB of
> virtual address space takes 1.69s; with the following patch applied, this
> operation can be done 1000 times in less than 0.01s
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
> 

Note that I think this patch will cripple our nice page table folding
in the unmap path, due to no longer using the 'next' from p??_addr_end,
even if the compiler is very smart.

I haven't confirmed this by looking at assembly, however I'd be almost
sure this is the case. Possibly a followup patch would be in order so
as to restore this, but I couldn't think of a really nice way to do it.

Basically we only want to return the return of the next level
zap_p??_range in the case that it returns with zap_work < 0.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-31  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-28  1:37 Robin Holt
2005-10-28 10:45 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-28 15:20   ` Hugh Dickins
2005-10-30  4:29     ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 16:58       ` Hugh Dickins
2005-10-31  9:10         ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-31  9:19           ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-10-31 12:20           ` Robin Holt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4365E1B4.4050409@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=holt@sgi.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox