From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4364442C.1070209@yahoo.com.au> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 14:55:24 +1100 From: Nick Piggin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages References: <20051028183326.A28611@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <20051029184728.100e3058.pj@sgi.com> <4364296E.1080905@yahoo.com.au> <20051029192611.79b9c5e7.pj@sgi.com> <43643195.9040600@yahoo.com.au> <20051029200916.61a32331.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20051029200916.61a32331.pj@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Paul Jackson Cc: rohit.seth@intel.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Paul Jackson wrote: > Nick wrote: > >>See how can_try_harder and gfp_high is used currently. > > > Ah - by "current" you meant in Linus's or Andrew's tree, > not as in Seth's current patch. Since they are booleans, > rather than tri-values, using an enum is overkill. Ok. > Yup. > Now I'm one less clue short of understanding. Thanks. > I'll be more constructive next time round, and provide an actual patch to address any of my remaining concerns after this latest round of feedback. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org