From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <43591E6F.4020506@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:59:27 +0900 From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface References: <20051020225935.19761.57434.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20051020225955.19761.53060.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <4358588D.1080307@jp.fujitsu.com> <435896CA.1000101@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Simon Derr , Andrew Morton , Mike Kravetz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Magnus Damm , Marcelo Tosatti , Paul Jackson List-ID: Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > >>>>How about this ? >>>>+cpuset_update_task_mems_allowed(task, new); (this isn't implemented >>>>now >> >>*new* is already guaranteed to be the subset of current mem_allowed. >>Is this violate the permission ? > > > Could the cpuset_mems_allowed(task) function update the mems_allowed if > needed? It looks I was wrong :( see Paul's e-mail. he describes the problem of my suggestion in detail. -- Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org