From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <430B24A6.5010906@yahoo.com.au> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 23:29:10 +1000 From: Nick Piggin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH 2/2] pagefault scalability alternative References: <430A6D08.1080707@yahoo.com.au> <430B0662.3060509@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Christoph Lameter , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Nick Piggin wrote: > >>Which brings up another issue - this surely conflicts rather >>badly with PageReserved removal :( Not that there is anything >>wrong with that, but I don't like to create these kinds of >>problems for people... > > > Conflicts in the sense that I'm messing all over source files which > removing PageReserved touches? > > Or in some deeper sense, that it makes the whole project of removing > PageReserved more difficult (I don't see how)? > No, just diff conflicts. > >>Do we still want to remove PageReserved sooner rather than >>later? > > > I'd say remove PageReserved sooner; > or at least your "remove it from the core" subset. > OK so long as you're still happy with that. You'd been a bit quiet on the subject and I had just been assuming that's because you've got no more big objections to it. Just wanted to clarify - thanks. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org