linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc4] fix get_user_pages bug
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 22:13:10 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42F0B4D6.5030604@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0508031231540.13845@goblin.wat.veritas.com>

Hugh Dickins wrote:

> Stupidity was the reason I thought handle_mm_fault couldn't be inline:
> I was picturing it static inline within mm/memory.c, failed to make the
> great intellectual leap you've achieved by moving it to include/linux/mm.h.
> 

Well it was one of my finer moments, so don't be too hard on
yourself.

> 
> No, I don't think it would break anything: it's just an historic oddity,
> used to be -1 for failure, and only got given a name recently, I think
> when wli added the proper major/minor counting.
> 
> Your version of the patch looks less hacky to me (not requiring
> VM_FAULT_WRITE_EXPECTED arg), though we could perfectly well remove
> that at leisure by adding VM_FAULT_WRITE case into all the arches in
> 2.6.14 (which might be preferable to leaving the __inline obscurity?).
> 

Well depends on what they want I suppose. Does it even make sense
to expose VM_FAULT_WRITE to arch code if it will just fall through
to VM_FAULT_MINOR?

With my earlier VM_FAULT_RACE thing, you can squint and say that's
a different case to VM_FAULT_MINOR - and accordingly not increment
the minor fault count. Afterall, minor faults *seem* to track count
of modifications made to the pte entry minus major faults, rather
than the number of times the hardware traps. I say this because we
increment the number in get_user_pages too.

But...

> I don't mind either way, but since you've not yet found an actual
> error in mine, I'd prefer you to make yours a tidyup patch on top,
> Signed-off-by your own good self, and let Linus decide whether he
> wants to apply yours on top or not.  Or perhaps the decision rests
> for the moment with Robin, whether he gets his customer to test
> yours or mine - whichever is tested is the one which should go in.
> 

I agree that for the moment we probably just want something that
works. I'd be just as happy to go with your patch as is for now.

Nick

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-03 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-30 20:53 get_user_pages() with write=1 and force=1 gets read-only pages Robin Holt
2005-07-30 22:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-07-31  1:52   ` Nick Piggin
2005-07-31 10:52     ` Robin Holt
2005-07-31 11:07       ` Nick Piggin
2005-07-31 11:30         ` Robin Holt
2005-07-31 11:39           ` Robin Holt
2005-07-31 12:09           ` Robin Holt
2005-07-31 22:27             ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-01  3:22               ` Roland McGrath
2005-08-01  8:21                 ` [patch 2.6.13-rc4] fix get_user_pages bug Nick Piggin
2005-08-01  9:19                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-01  9:27                     ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-01 10:15                       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-01 10:57                         ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-01 19:43                           ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-01 20:08                             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-01 21:06                               ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-01 21:51                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-01 22:01                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02 12:01                                     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-08-02 12:26                                       ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-02 12:28                                         ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-02 15:19                                         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-08-02 15:30                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02 16:03                                         ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-02 16:25                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02 17:02                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02 17:27                                               ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-02 17:21                                             ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-02 18:47                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02 19:20                                                 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-02 19:54                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02 20:55                                                     ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-03 10:24                                                       ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-03 11:47                                                         ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-03 12:13                                                           ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-08-03 16:12                                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-03 16:39                                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-03 16:42                                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-03 17:12                                                           ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-03 23:03                                                           ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-04 14:14                                                           ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-08-04 14:30                                                             ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-04 15:00                                                               ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-08-04 15:35                                                                 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-04 16:32                                                                   ` Russell King
2005-08-04 15:36                                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-04 16:29                                                               ` Russell King
2005-08-03 10:24                                                       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-08-03 11:57                                                         ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-02 16:44                                         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-08-01 15:42                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-01 18:18                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-03  8:24                       ` Robin Holt
2005-08-03 11:31                         ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-04 11:48                           ` Robin Holt
2005-08-04 13:04                             ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-01 19:29                     ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-01 19:48                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02  8:07                         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-08-01 19:57                       ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-01 20:16                         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02  0:14                     ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-02  1:27                     ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-02  3:45                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-02  4:25                         ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-02  4:35                           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-01 20:03                   ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-01 20:12                     ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-01 20:26                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-01 20:51                       ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-02 14:02 Dan Higgins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42F0B4D6.5030604@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=holt@sgi.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox