From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <42014605.4060707@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:28:37 -0600 From: Ray Bryant MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: migration cache, updated References: <20041123121447.GE4524@logos.cnet> <20041124.192156.73388074.taka@valinux.co.jp> <20041201202101.GB5459@dmt.cyclades> <20041208.222307.64517559.taka@valinux.co.jp> <20050117095955.GC18785@logos.cnet> <41FE79EF.8040204@sgi.com> <20050131184422.GD15694@logos.cnet> In-Reply-To: <20050131184422.GD15694@logos.cnet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Hirokazu Takahashi , linux-mm@kvack.org, iwamoto@valinux.co.jp, haveblue@us.ibm.com, hugh@veritas.com List-ID: Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > >> >>(This message comes from ia64_do_page_fault() and appears to because >>handle_mm_fault() returned FAULT_OOM....) >> >>I haven't looked into this further, but was wondering if perhaps one of >>you would understand why the migrate cache patch would fail in this way? > > > I can't think of anything right now - probably do_wp_page() is returning FAULT_OOM, > can you confirm that? > No, it doesn't appear to be do_wp_page(). It looks like get_swap_page() returns FAULT_OOM followed by get_user_pages() returning FAULT_OOM. For the page that causes the VM to kill the process, there is no return from get_user_pages() that returns FAULT_OOM. Not sure yet what is going on here. -- ----------------------------------------------- Ray Bryant 512-453-9679 (work) 512-507-7807 (cell) raybry@sgi.com raybry@austin.rr.com The box said: "Requires Windows 98 or better", so I installed Linux. ----------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org