linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/include/asm/kfence.h:46 kfence_protect
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 15:54:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41ac24c4-6c95-d946-2679-c1be2cb20536@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3bCV6VckVUEF7Pq@elver.google.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 517 bytes --]

On 11/17/22 15:23, Marco Elver wrote:
> Yes - it's the 'level != PG_LEVEL_4K'.

That plus the bisect made it pretty easy to find, thanks for the effort!

Could you double-check that the attached patch fixes it?  It seemed to
for me.

The issue was that the new "No changes, easy!" check in the suspect
commit didn't check the cpa->force_split option.  It didn't split down
to 4k and then all hell broke loose.

Oh, and I totally misread the kfence ability to tolerate partial TLB
flushes.  Sorry for the noise there!

[-- Attachment #2: kfence.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 505 bytes --]

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
index 220361ceb997..9b4e2ad957f6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
@@ -1727,7 +1727,8 @@ static int __change_page_attr_set_clr(struct cpa_data *cpa, int primary)
 	/*
 	 * No changes, easy!
 	 */
-	if (!(pgprot_val(cpa->mask_set) | pgprot_val(cpa->mask_clr)))
+	if (!(pgprot_val(cpa->mask_set) | pgprot_val(cpa->mask_clr))
+	    && !cpa->force_split)
 		return ret;
 
 	while (rempages) {

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-17 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-17 11:31 Naresh Kamboju
2022-11-17 13:58 ` Marco Elver
2022-11-17 14:34   ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-17 23:23     ` Marco Elver
2022-11-17 23:54       ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2022-11-18  9:19         ` Marco Elver
2022-11-18 10:32         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-21  7:28         ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-11-21  8:43           ` Marco Elver
2022-11-21  5:40     ` Naresh Kamboju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41ac24c4-6c95-d946-2679-c1be2cb20536@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox