From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <41D9AC2D.90409@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 14:33:49 -0600 From: Ray Bryant MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: page migration\ References: <41D98556.8050605@sgi.com> <1104776733.25994.11.camel@localhost> <41D99743.5000601@sgi.com> <20050103162406.GB14886@logos.cnet> <20050103171344.GD14886@logos.cnet> In-Reply-To: <20050103171344.GD14886@logos.cnet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Dave Hansen , Hirokazu Takahashi , linux-mm List-ID: Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > Memory migration makes sense for defragmentation too. > > I think we enough arguments for merging the migration code first, as you suggest. > > Its also easier to merge part-by-part than everything in one bunch. > > Yes? Absolutely. I guess the only question is when to propose the merge with -mm etc. Is your defragmentation code in a good enough state to be proposed as well, or should we wait a bit? I think we need at least one user of the code before we can propose that the memory migration code be merged, or do you think we the arguments are strong enough we can proceed with users "pending"? -- Best Regards, Ray ----------------------------------------------- Ray Bryant 512-453-9679 (work) 512-507-7807 (cell) raybry@sgi.com raybry@austin.rr.com The box said: "Requires Windows 98 or better", so I installed Linux. ----------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org