From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] alternate 4-level page tables patches
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 09:47:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41C71045.1020304@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041220174357.GB4316@wotan.suse.de>
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 11:06:48AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>>
>>On Sat, 18 Dec 2004, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
>>>Ok except on i386 where someone decided to explicitely turn it off
>>>all the time :/
>>
>>Because it used to be broken as hell. The code it generated was absolute
>>and utter crap.
>
>
> I disagree. It generated significantly smaller code and the SUSE
> kernel has been shipping with it for several releases and I'm not
> aware of any bug report related to unit-at-a-time.
>
>
>>Maybe some versions of gcc get it right now, but what it _used_ to do was
>>to make functions that had hundreds of bytes of stack-space, because gcc
>>would never re-use stack slots, and if you have code like
>
>
> The right fix in that case would have been to add a few "noinline"s
> to these cases (should be easy to check for if it really happens
> by grepping assembly code for large stack frames), not penalize code quality
> of the whole kernel.
>
> I did a grep over a gcc 4.0-snapshot compiled i386 kernel. There
> are a few really bad cases (e.g. GDTH, intelfb, some WAN stuff)
> that should be fixed, but from a quick review they all just put a single big
> object on the stack, and are not affected by unit-at-a-time.
>
> [note names are after the occurrence, not before]
>
> everything > 0x400
>
> 808: 81 ec 58 09 00 00 sub $0x958,%esp
> ./drivers/video/intelfb/intelfb.o
> 808: 81 ec 58 09 00 00 sub $0x958,%esp
> ./drivers/video/intelfb/intelfbdrv.o
> 3b4: 81 ec 08 04 00 00 sub $0x408,%esp
> ./drivers/net/wan/cyclomx.o
> e8: 81 ec 08 04 00 00 sub $0x408,%esp
> ./drivers/net/wan/cycx_x25.o
> 4d82: 81 ec 44 06 00 00 sub $0x644,%esp
> 184b: 81 ec 48 02 00 00 sub $0x248,%esp
> ./drivers/scsi/gdth.o
>
> More smaller ones.
I posted a patch for intelfbdrv yesterday (on linux-fbdev-devel
m-l) and I'm working on gdth stack usage right now.
Basically I'm just tackling the top offenders (> 1000 bytes).
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-20 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-18 6:55 [RFC][PATCH 0/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 6:55 ` [PATCH 1/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 6:56 ` [PATCH 2/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 6:56 ` [PATCH 3/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 6:57 ` [PATCH 4/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 6:58 ` [PATCH 5/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 6:58 ` [PATCH 6/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 6:59 ` [PATCH 7/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 7:00 ` [PATCH 8/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 7:00 ` [PATCH 9/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 7:01 ` [PATCH 10/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 7:31 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-18 7:46 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 8:08 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-18 9:48 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-18 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-20 17:43 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-20 17:47 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2004-12-20 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-20 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-20 18:19 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-20 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-20 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-20 18:59 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-20 18:57 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-12-18 9:05 ` [PATCH 4/10] " Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 9:50 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-18 10:06 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 10:11 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-18 10:22 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 10:29 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 11:06 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-18 11:17 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 11:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-18 11:55 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-18 12:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-18 12:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-19 0:05 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-19 0:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-19 0:38 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-19 1:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-19 1:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-19 2:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-19 2:26 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-19 5:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-19 6:02 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-19 18:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-20 1:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-18 10:45 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-18 10:58 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-19 0:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/10] " Hugh Dickins
2004-12-19 0:33 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-20 18:04 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-20 18:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-20 18:53 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-21 0:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-21 0:22 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-21 0:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-21 0:47 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-21 2:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-12-21 3:21 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-21 3:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-21 3:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-21 4:04 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-21 4:08 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-21 9:36 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-21 10:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-12-21 10:59 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-21 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-12-21 20:19 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-21 23:49 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-22 10:38 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-22 11:19 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-22 11:23 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-22 18:07 ` Andi Kleen
2004-12-30 21:24 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-21 10:52 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41C71045.1020304@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox