From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <41AEC4D7.4060507@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 02:31:35 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: page fault scalability patch V12 [0/7]: Overview and performance tests References: <41AEB44D.2040805@pobox.com><20041201223441.3820fbc0.akpm@osdl.org><41AEBAB9.3050705@pobox.com> <20041201230217.1d2071a8.akpm@osdl.org> <179540000.1101972418@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <179540000.1101972418@[10.10.2.4]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Andrew Morton , torvalds@osdl.org, clameter@sgi.com, hugh@veritas.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Martin J. Bligh wrote: > Yeah, probably. Though the stress tests catch a lot more than the > functionality ones. The big pain in the ass is drivers, because I don't > have a hope in hell of testing more than 1% of them. My dream is that hardware vendors rotate their current machines through a test shop :) It would be nice to make sure that the popular drivers get daily test coverage. Jeff, dreaming on -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org