From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] abstract pagetable locking and pte updates
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:20:13 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4181EF2D.5000407@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
Hello,
Following are patches that abstract page table operations to
allow lockless implementations by using cmpxchg or per-pte locks.
The work is inspired by and uses parts of Christoph Lameter's
pte cmpxchg work. It is not a clearly superior approach, but
an alternative way to tackle the problem.
It is a lot more intrusive, but it has also gone a bit further
in reducing page_table_lock usage. It is also designed with pte
locking in mind, which may be needed for PPC64, and will allow
100% removal of the page table lock.
The API is a transactional one, which fitted the problem quite
well in my mind. Please read comments for patch 4/7 for a more
detailed overview.
It is stable so far on i386 and x86-64. Page fault performance
on a quad opteron is up maybe 150%. Oh and it also rids
page_referenced_one of the page_table_lock, which could be a
win in some situations.
Known issues: Hugepages, nonlinear pages haven't been looked at
and are quite surely broken. TLB flushing (gather/finish) runs
without the page table lock, which will break at least SPARC64.
Additional atomic ops in copy_page_range slow down lmbench fork
by 7%.
Comments and discussion about this and/or Christoph's patches
welcome. They apply to 2.6.10-rc1-bk7
Thanks,
Nick
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2004-10-29 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-29 7:20 Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-10-29 7:20 ` [PATCH 1/7] " Nick Piggin
2004-10-29 7:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] " Nick Piggin
2004-10-29 7:21 ` [PATCH 3/7] " Nick Piggin
2004-10-29 7:21 ` [PATCH 4/7] " Nick Piggin
2004-10-29 7:22 ` [PATCH 5/7] " Nick Piggin
2004-10-29 7:23 ` [PATCH 6/7] " Nick Piggin
2004-10-29 7:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] " Nick Piggin
2004-10-29 7:46 ` [PATCH 0/7] " William Lee Irwin III
2004-11-02 0:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-11-02 0:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-11-02 1:34 ` Nick Piggin
2004-11-02 1:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-11-02 2:38 ` Nick Piggin
2004-11-02 6:57 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-11-02 17:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2004-10-29 11:45 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-29 20:52 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-10-30 2:46 ` Nick Piggin
2004-11-02 0:19 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4181EF2D.5000407@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox