From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] sparsemem patches (was nonlinear)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:04:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <418118A1.9060004@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <098973549.shadowen.org>
Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Here are the current versions of my implmentation of
> CONFIG_SPARSEMEM; formerly CONFIG_NONLINEAR. Mostly bug fixes to
> the alloc_remap() stuff and the conversion over to CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
> throughout. The first few are esentially unchanged and only included
> for completeness.
>
> As before they apply in numerical order. This lot was diffed
> against 2.6.9 straight.
>
> I take the view that the the breaking of V=P+c is an option
> to the memory model here. So I'd expect to see something like
> CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_NONLINEAR or something. So perhaps in the end this
> should be CONFIG_NONLINEAR if that happens. But anyhow, changing
> its name now to SPARSEMEM will cirtainly help to reduce confusion :).
Thanks, Andy!
One thing that should simplify your code a bit are the no-buddy-bitmap
patches which are sitting in -mm right now. You might want to think
about porting to -mm, it should reduce the total amount of code.
Also, after taking a bit more critical a look at the set, I'm not sure
they're quite ready for merging yet. There are still a pretty good
number of #ifdefs
For instance, this:
+#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_ALLOC_REMAP
+ map = (unsigned long *) alloc_remap(pgdat->node_id,
+ bitmap_size);
+ if (!map)
+#endif
+ map = (unsigned long *)alloc_bootmem_node(pgdat,
+ bitmap_size);
+ zone->free_area[order].map = map;
Could all be solved by doing #ifdef in a header to declare alloc_remap()
to return NULL if !HAVE_ARCH_ALLOC_REMAP. In any case
HAVE_ARCH_ALLOC_REMAP should be defined via a Kconfig file, not in a
header.
Have you given any thought to using virt_to_page(page)->foo method to
store section information instead of using page->flags? It seems we're
already sucking up page->flags left and right, and I'd hate to consume
that many more.
Although simple arithmetically, the calculations for the flags shift
does constitute a lot of code churn, and does add quite a bit of
complexity.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-28 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <098973549.shadowen.org>
2004-10-28 16:04 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2004-10-28 16:19 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-10-28 16:32 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-10-28 16:52 ` [Lhms-devel] " Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=418118A1.9060004@us.ibm.com \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox