From: "Kuan-Ying Lee (李冠穎)" <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com>
To: "andreyknvl@gmail.com" <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"Qun-wei Lin (林群崴)" <Qun-wei.Lin@mediatek.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Chinwen Chang (張錦文)" <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com>,
"dvyukov@google.com" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"kasan-dev@googlegroups.com" <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com" <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"vincenzo.frascino@arm.com" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
"glider@google.com" <glider@google.com>,
"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kasan: infer the requested size by scanning shadow memory
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 14:58:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <414630a65853f18c450cf1451e013b749382cbac.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+fCnZcS-p5nCALg4-96cp+sXNZSvN_u=L+=xK+zaH2rigJMKw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2023-01-23 at 22:46 +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 10:39 AM Kuan-Ying Lee
> <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > We scan the shadow memory to infer the requested size instead of
> > printing cache->object_size directly.
> >
> > This patch will fix the confusing kasan slab-out-of-bounds
> > report like below. [1]
> > Report shows "cache kmalloc-192 of size 192", but user
> > actually kmalloc(184).
> >
> > ==================================================================
> > BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _find_next_bit+0x143/0x160
> > lib/find_bit.c:109
> > Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880175766b8 by task kworker/1:1/26
> > ...
> > The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888017576600
> > which belongs to the cache kmalloc-192 of size 192
> > The buggy address is located 184 bytes inside of
> > 192-byte region [ffff888017576600, ffff8880175766c0)
> > ...
> > Memory state around the buggy address:
> > ffff888017576580: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
> > ffff888017576600: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > > ffff888017576680: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
> >
> > ^
> > ffff888017576700: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
> > ffff888017576780: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
> > ==================================================================
> >
> > After this patch, slab-out-of-bounds report will show as below.
> > ==================================================================
> > ...
> > The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888017576600
> > which belongs to the cache kmalloc-192 of size 192
> > The buggy address is located 0 bytes right of
> > allocated 184-byte region [ffff888017576600, ffff8880175766b8)
> > ...
> > ==================================================================
> >
> > Link:
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216457__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!iEOOICl7DzhvfYobmQ8MsNFAWmbqicXdjd0LYWw9uBOqwj8lai7oEODVdRJyWUEXr11A3-m7wbIX2cdpxLwiW6Tm$
> > $ [1]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > V1 -> V2:
> > - Implement getting allocated size of object for tag-based kasan.
> > - Refine the kasan report.
> > - Check if it is slab-out-of-bounds report type.
> > - Thanks for Andrey and Dmitry suggestion.
>
> Hi Kuan-Ying,
>
> I came up with a few more things to fix while testing your patch and
> decided to address them myself. Please check the v3 here:
>
>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xairy/linux/commit/012a584a9f11ba08a6051b075f7fd0a0eb54c719__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!iEOOICl7DzhvfYobmQ8MsNFAWmbqicXdjd0LYWw9uBOqwj8lai7oEODVdRJyWUEXr11A3-m7wbIX2cdpxNwCtfpJ$
>
>
> The significant changes are to print "freed" for a slab-use-after-
> free
> and only print the region state for the Generic mode (printing it for
> Tag-Based modes doesn't work properly atm, see the comment in the
> code). The rest is clean-ups and a few added comments. See the full
> list of changes in the commit message.
>
> Please check whether this v3 looks good to you, and then feel free to
> submit it.
It looks good to me.
I will send the v3.
Thank you.
> Thank you!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-28 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-18 9:38 Kuan-Ying Lee
2023-01-23 21:46 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-01-28 14:58 ` Kuan-Ying Lee (李冠穎) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=414630a65853f18c450cf1451e013b749382cbac.camel@mediatek.com \
--to=kuan-ying.lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=Qun-wei.Lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=chinwen.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox