From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/dmapool.c: avoid duplicate memset within dma_pool_alloc
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:00:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <413d8666-7a82-efd7-6716-13658016ca10@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1dbe63ff-5575-745b-653a-a992ae53e1aa@samsung.com>
On 2022-08-16 13:39, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18.07.2022 08:28, Liu Song wrote:
>> From: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
>>
>> In "dma_alloc_from_dev_coherent" and "dma_direct_alloc",
>> the allocated memory is explicitly set to 0.
>>
>> A helper function "use_dev_coherent_memory" is introduced here to
>> determine whether the memory is allocated by "dma_alloc_from_dev_coherent".
>>
>> And use "get_dma_ops" to determine whether the memory is allocated by
>> "dma_direct_alloc".
>>
>> After this modification, memory allocated using "dma_pool_zalloc" can avoid
>> duplicate memset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> This patch landed linux next-20220816. Unfortunately it causes serious
> issues on ARM 32bit systems. I've observed it on ARM 32bit Samsung
> Exynos 5422 based Odroid XU4 board with USB r8152 driver. After applying
> this patch and loading r8152 driver I only the following endless
> messages in the log:
>
> xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.9.auto: WARN Event TRB for slot 1 ep 0 with no TDs queued?
> xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.9.auto: WARN Event TRB for slot 1 ep 0 with no TDs queued?
> xhci-hcd xhci-hcd.9.auto: WARN Event TRB for slot 1 ep 0 with no TDs queued?
>
> It looks that there are drivers which rely on the fact that the dma
> coherent buffers are always zeroed.
It's not even that, the change here is just obviously broken, since it
ends up entirely ignoring want_init_on_alloc() for devices using
dma-direct. Sure, the memory backing a dma_page is zeroed *once* by its
initial dma-coherent allocation, but who says we're not not reallocating
pool entries from an existing dma_page?
I'm not convinced it's worth trying to special-case this at all, since
we can only do it reliably for the first pool entry allocated from a new
dma_page, and that will only happen as the pool initially grows to a
suitable size for its working set, after which no further new pages are
likely to be allocated for the lifetime of the pool. Even if there is a
case to be made for doing so, it would need to be based on the flow
through dma_pool_alloc() itself, not some nonsense heuristic on the device.
Andrew, please drop this patch.
Thanks,
Robin.
>> ---
>> include/linux/dma-map-ops.h | 5 +++++
>> mm/dmapool.c | 5 ++++-
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
>> index 0d5b06b..c29948d 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
>> @@ -171,6 +171,10 @@ int dma_alloc_from_dev_coherent(struct device *dev, ssize_t size,
>> int dma_release_from_dev_coherent(struct device *dev, int order, void *vaddr);
>> int dma_mmap_from_dev_coherent(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> void *cpu_addr, size_t size, int *ret);
>> +static inline bool use_dev_coherent_memory(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + return dev->dma_mem ? true : false;
>> +}
>> #else
>> static inline int dma_declare_coherent_memory(struct device *dev,
>> phys_addr_t phys_addr, dma_addr_t device_addr, size_t size)
>> @@ -180,6 +184,7 @@ static inline int dma_declare_coherent_memory(struct device *dev,
>> #define dma_alloc_from_dev_coherent(dev, size, handle, ret) (0)
>> #define dma_release_from_dev_coherent(dev, order, vaddr) (0)
>> #define dma_mmap_from_dev_coherent(dev, vma, vaddr, order, ret) (0)
>> +#define use_dev_coherent_memory(dev) (0)
>> #endif /* CONFIG_DMA_DECLARE_COHERENT */
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_GLOBAL_POOL
>> diff --git a/mm/dmapool.c b/mm/dmapool.c
>> index a7eb5d0..6e03530 100644
>> --- a/mm/dmapool.c
>> +++ b/mm/dmapool.c
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>>
>> #include <linux/device.h>
>> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>> +#include <linux/dma-map-ops.h>
>> #include <linux/dmapool.h>
>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>> #include <linux/list.h>
>> @@ -372,7 +373,9 @@ void *dma_pool_alloc(struct dma_pool *pool, gfp_t mem_flags,
>> #endif
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->lock, flags);
>>
>> - if (want_init_on_alloc(mem_flags))
>> + if (want_init_on_alloc(mem_flags) &&
>> + !use_dev_coherent_memory(pool->dev) &&
>> + get_dma_ops(pool->dev))
>> memset(retval, 0, pool->size);
>>
>> return retval;
>
> Best regards
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-18 6:28 Liu Song
[not found] ` <CGME20220816123958eucas1p1b03a5efa1f5804245a5c1a9b27529015@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2022-08-16 12:39 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-16 15:00 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2022-08-17 2:03 ` Liu Song
2022-08-17 5:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-18 8:37 ` Liu Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=413d8666-7a82-efd7-6716-13658016ca10@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liusong@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox