From: Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LHMS <lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@valinux.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] no bitmap buddy allocator : removing atomic ops (4/4)
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 15:00:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <413FF183.2010207@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <413EF64B.2060407@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA wrote:
> To check effects of this patch. I made a tiny test.
>
> ************** test-program ********************
> for(i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
> mmap(16 Mega bytes, MAP_ANON);
> touch all pages;
> munmap(16 Mega bytes);
> }
> ************************************************
These are results when CONFIG_SMP=n
reference kernel- 2.6.9-rc1-mm4
Total 0:31.51 System 29.53 User 1.92
Total 0:31.76 System 29.82 User 1.89
Total 0:31.76 System 29.81 User 1.89
Total 0:31.84 System 29.79 User 2.00
Total 0:32.05 System 30.01 User 1.99
no bitmap witout optimization
Total 0:31.17 System 29.18 User 1.93
Total 0:31.30 System 29.28 User 1.97
Total 0:31.39 System 29.36 User 1.97
Total 0:31.46 System 29.40 User 2.02
Total 0:31.51 System 29.45 User 2.00
no bitmap with optimization
Total 0:31.17 System 29.10 User 2.01
Total 0:31.28 System 29.32 User 1.91
Total 0:31.35 System 29.29 User 2.01
Total 0:31.47 System 29.43 User 1.98
Total 0:31.50 System 29.52 User 1.93
There is no difference between optimized and not-optimized version.
-- Kame
> Results of this program.
> Host : Intex Xeon 1.8GHz x2, Memory 8Gbytes. Multi-user mode.
>
> Reference Kernel --- linux-2.6.9-rc1-mm4
> Total 0:35.79 System 33.89 User 1.88
> Total 0:35.44 System 33.58 User 1.85
> Total 0:35.75 System 33.81 User 1.91
> Total 0:35.89 System 34.03 User 1.82
> Total 0:35.93 System 34.03 User 1.84
>
> No-bitmap without this micro-optimization patch
> Total 0:37.58 System 35.69 User 1.89
> Total 0:37.52 System 35.66 User 1.86
> Total 0:37.56 System 35.68 User 1.88
> Total 0:37.64 System 35.76 User 1.88
> Total 0:37.72 System 35.89 User 1.82
>
> No-bitmap with this micro-optimization patch.
> Total 0:35.28 System 33.45 User 1.81
> Total 0:35.38 System 33.62 User 1.75
> Total 0:35.44 System 33.58 User 1.84
> Total 0:35.52 System 33.58 User 1.90
> Total 0:35.79 System 33.92 User 1.81
>
> Single-user-mode.
>
> reference-kernel linux-2.6.9-rc1-mm4:
> Total 0:35.20 System 33.32 User 1.88
> Total 0:35.23 System 33.37 User 1.85
> Total 0:35.58 System 33.77 User 1.81
> Total 0:35.49 System 33.60 User 1.90
> Total 0:35.79 System 33.80 User 1.99
>
> No-bitmap without this micro-optimization patch
> Total 0:36.83 System 35.16 User 1.67
> Total 0:36.45 System 34.66 User 1.79
> Total 0:36.81 System 35.10 User 1.70
> Total 0:36.89 System 35.24 User 1.65
> Total 0:36.82 System 35.14 User 1.68
>
> No-bitmap with this micor-optimization patch:
> Total 0:34.97 System 33.07 User 1.89
> Total 0:34.94 System 32.98 User 1.95
> Total 0:34.99 System 33.11 User 1.87
> Total 0:34.90 System 33.14 User 1.76
> Total 0:34.92 System 33.02 User 1.90
>
>
> Results with this patch is better than ones without this by 2 seconds.
> 2/1000 = 2ms per 1 iteration (for 16 Megabytes alloc/free).
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-09 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-08 12:08 Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-09-09 6:00 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=413FF183.2010207@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox