Re: [Lhms-devel] Re: [RFC] free_area[] bitmap elimination [0/3]

[Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>]

Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 07:36, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
>>I'll try and give these patches a run on a NUMA-Q today.  Those machines
>>are very cache-sensitive and should magnify any positive or negative
>>effects.  
> 
> 
> DISCLAIMER: SPEC(tm) and the benchmark name SDET(tm) are registered 
> trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. This 
> benchmarking was performed for research purposes only, and the run
> results are non-compliant and not-comparable with any published results.
> 
> Scripts: 32     
> Iterations: 40
>                       2.6.8.1- | 2.6.8.1-
>                       vanilla  | nofreemap
>                     -----------+-----------
> Average Throughput:   18836.68 |  18839.37
> Standard Deviation:    1538.89 |   1791.29
> 
> No statistically different results.  Very cool.
> 

Thank you for trying and testing.
This results looks  good and encourages me :)

-- Kame


-- 
--the clue is these footmarks leading to the door.--
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>