From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
"yuwang.yuwang" <yuwang.yuwang@alibaba-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: don't warn about allocations which stall for too long
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 18:42:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40ed01d3-1475-cd4a-0dff-f7a6ee24d5e9@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171101113336.19758220@gandalf.local.home>
On 11/01/2017 04:33 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 09:30:05 +0100
> Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>
>>
>> But still, it seems to me that the scheme only works as long as there
>> are printk()'s coming with some reasonable frequency. There's still a
>> corner case when a storm of printk()'s can come that will fill the ring
>> buffers, and while during the storm the printing will be distributed
>> between CPUs nicely, the last unfortunate CPU after the storm subsides
>> will be left with a large accumulated buffer to print, and there will be
>> no waiters to take over if there are no more printk()'s coming. What
>> then, should it detect such situation and defer the flushing?
>
> No!
>
> If such a case happened, that means the system is doing something
> really stupid.
Hm, what about e.g. a soft lockup that triggers backtraces from all
CPU's? Yes, having softlockups is "stupid" but sometimes they do happen
and the system still recovers (just some looping operation is missing
cond_resched() and took longer than expected). It would be sad if it
didn't recover because of a printk() issue...
> Btw, each printk that takes over, does one message, so the last one to
> take over, shouldn't have a full buffer anyway.
There might be multiple messages per each CPU, e.g. the softlockup
backtraces.
> But still, if you have such a hypothetical situation, the system should
> just crash. The printk is still bounded by the length of the buffer.
> Although it is slow, it will finish.
Finish, but with single CPU doing the printing, which is wrong?
> Which is not the case with the
> current situation. And the current situation (as which this patch
> demonstrates) does happen today and is not hypothetical.
Yep, so ideally it can be fixed without corner cases :)
Vlastimil
> -- Steve
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-01 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-26 11:28 Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-26 11:41 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-08 10:30 ` peter enderborg
2017-11-09 8:52 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-09 9:34 ` peter enderborg
2017-11-09 10:09 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-09 10:19 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-26 14:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2017-10-31 19:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-11-01 8:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-11-01 13:38 ` Petr Mladek
2017-11-01 15:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-11-02 11:46 ` Petr Mladek
2017-11-02 14:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-11-01 15:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-11-01 17:42 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2017-11-01 17:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-11-02 8:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-11-02 9:14 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-11-02 14:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-11-02 12:55 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-02 15:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-11-02 17:06 ` [PATCH v2] printk: Add console owner and waiter logic to load balance console writes Steven Rostedt
2017-11-02 17:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-11-02 17:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-11-03 10:19 ` Jan Kara
2017-11-03 11:18 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40ed01d3-1475-cd4a-0dff-f7a6ee24d5e9@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=yuwang.yuwang@alibaba-inc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox