linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Dave McCracken <dmccr@us.ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: zilvinas@gemtek.lt, helgehaf@aitel.hist.no,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.62-mm3] objrmap fix for X
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:14:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40780000.1046240068@[10.10.2.4]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <453440000.1046214174@[10.1.1.5]>

>>> Keep the flag for now, find the escaped page under X, remove the flag
>>> later?
>> 
>> It occurred to me I'm already using (abusing?) the flag for nonlinear
>> pages, so I have to keep it.  I'll chase solutions for X.
> 
> Ok, the vm_ops->nopage function is set in drivers like drm and agp.  I
> don't think it's reasonable to require all of them to set PageAnon.  So
> here's a patch that tests the page on do_no_page and sets the flag
> appropriately.

Well, it runs fine, but I get truly freaky performance results. My machine
might have gone wacko on me or something - the patch seems perfectly simple
to me. Kernbench is all over the map - user and elapsed way up, system is
down. Ummm .. probably all too strange to be true, and I've made a mistake,
but if some more sane person than I could run a quick test, would help.

Thanks,

M.

Kernbench-2: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 2 x num_cpus)
                              Elapsed        User      System         CPU
              2.5.62-mjb3       43.92      557.65       94.12     1483.50
                     test       68.61      923.78       90.19     1477.33

Kernbench-16: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 16 x num_cpus)
                              Elapsed        User      System         CPU
              2.5.62-mjb3       45.21      560.46      114.58     1492.67
                     test       69.04      927.20      100.56     1488.17

DISCLAIMER: SPEC(tm) and the benchmark name SDET(tm) are registered
trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. This 
benchmarking was performed for research purposes only, and the run results
are non-compliant and not-comparable with any published results.

Results are shown as percentages of the first set displayed

SDET 1  (see disclaimer)
                                Throughput    Std. Dev
                   2.5.62-mjb3       100.0%         3.1%
                          test        83.9%         1.7%

SDET 2  (see disclaimer)
                                Throughput    Std. Dev
                   2.5.62-mjb3       100.0%         4.0%
                          test        87.0%         3.8%

SDET 4  (see disclaimer)
                                Throughput    Std. Dev
                   2.5.62-mjb3       100.0%         2.0%
                          test        90.3%         2.1%

SDET 8  (see disclaimer)
                                Throughput    Std. Dev
                   2.5.62-mjb3       100.0%         4.6%
                          test        95.6%         6.3%

SDET 16  (see disclaimer)
                                Throughput    Std. Dev
                   2.5.62-mjb3       100.0%         2.7%
                          test       103.0%         3.4%

SDET 32  (see disclaimer)
                                Throughput    Std. Dev
                   2.5.62-mjb3       100.0%         0.9%
                          test        96.6%         1.0%

SDET 64  (see disclaimer)
                                Throughput    Std. Dev
                   2.5.62-mjb3       100.0%         1.1%
                          test        94.8%         0.6%

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>

  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-26  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-24  7:00 2.5.62-mm3 Andrew Morton
2003-02-24 12:26 ` 2.5.62-mm3 - no X for me Helge Hafting
2003-02-24 20:16   ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-25  9:45     ` Zilvinas Valinskas
2003-02-25  9:55       ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-25 17:57         ` Dave McCracken
2003-02-25 21:27           ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-25 21:46             ` Dave McCracken
2003-02-25 23:02               ` [PATCH 2.5.62-mm3] objrmap fix for X Dave McCracken
2003-02-26  6:14                 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-02-26 17:52                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-26 18:03                     ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-02-26 18:24                       ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-01  9:31                     ` Anton Blanchard
2003-02-25 18:49         ` 2.5.62-mm3 -Panics during dbt2 run Cliff White
2003-02-25 19:12           ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-25 22:37             ` 2.5.62-mm3 -DBT2 (was) " Cliff White
2003-02-24 18:04 ` 2.5.62-mm3 won't mount root Steven Cole

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='40780000.1046240068@[10.10.2.4]' \
    --to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=dmccr@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=zilvinas@gemtek.lt \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox