From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5927C77B7E for ; Tue, 2 May 2023 17:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 4B1876B0074; Tue, 2 May 2023 13:34:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 439BB6B0075; Tue, 2 May 2023 13:34:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 2DA5B6B0078; Tue, 2 May 2023 13:34:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8416B0074 for ; Tue, 2 May 2023 13:34:12 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1683048851; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=H8EQxB5Rji2ViwQdGaI3sszlcO5mXGtLYkFgR+gxOeA=; b=P+1Y62ieRfl6JfG7ckZ3t3M5VmzLJwsKnUB5iGHETr91YQBSYWliOoo4n/dugewt6YXEK2 jjfz9u2x6GstgbOYeRbTdysGf0GqHcL5F+Y4KRzJ5hhYX7vpRrz2rgiYuslhJqWH54TokJ 2OGfhetGKdGNQu5B2zCDqweJpjrKzZM= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-39-VnFU7eJANsSgRJXbF3HXzQ-1; Tue, 02 May 2023 13:34:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: VnFU7eJANsSgRJXbF3HXzQ-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f32b3835e9so13637035e9.1 for ; Tue, 02 May 2023 10:34:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683048849; x=1685640849; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject:organization:from :references:cc:to:content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=H8EQxB5Rji2ViwQdGaI3sszlcO5mXGtLYkFgR+gxOeA=; b=MD5ukx6MR7s4Mts+ubdsw+RHN5tIAa2nIQjJfJfNUG4GZBBMhU98cNYbI7XqKWaaxL PIe2NgIOqKrd7uE/9bL5eIMYRb7OG53KnxtaDXYWvYf23Gb0JmuNrSHzfZ4USTzj4yjR +P6wi1KhUJJ7wr554PLNUXU/4zF6N2YdWUTzO0Z9FWBeCDfWbn+7EuMYkCjvqgfmJ0nh 8kMOorNN9DqF7AKuAw1r/q9JVMhJ9+ZAPKCV4Rm8xIOP0dN+BRez1R21Bd8C7RW7ajIx jEAWk6RyiEtgxJ4Yl1al81liOaA/PRTar0J1MbIFASxksH3ZJsLh3UJgyNluCUIe0b0Z 46jg== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyu5jvtK+IT5diHmSdCx7XyQPL0IATTHTLBOvoB91d7fttcoeoY AfbYACFepdOxtsU/NPOtfdaGRSyMCF5IiSfX7qA1VZDlHr+fimc+sWkvKMKMSlHuFZcALV6fJ70 HJUmhFWF/Qvw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:243:b0:3f0:7eda:c19f with SMTP id 3-20020a05600c024300b003f07edac19fmr13178741wmj.11.1683048849406; Tue, 02 May 2023 10:34:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4rY/Uw9D184Y6lbc9agQJLV0y9DAm7UV6MhvxNJyexluz6bhaJuqIcn/csPhLRfdlbL7/yQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:243:b0:3f0:7eda:c19f with SMTP id 3-20020a05600c024300b003f07edac19fmr13178707wmj.11.1683048849038; Tue, 02 May 2023 10:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c700:2400:6b79:2aa:9602:7016? (p200300cbc70024006b7902aa96027016.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c700:2400:6b79:2aa:9602:7016]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q6-20020a5d5746000000b003063db8f45bsm351606wrw.23.2023.05.02.10.34.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 May 2023 10:34:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <406fd43a-a051-5fbe-6f66-a43f5e7e7573@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 19:34:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Jason Gunthorpe , Jens Axboe , Matthew Wilcox , Dennis Dalessandro , Leon Romanovsky , Christian Benvenuti , Nelson Escobar , Bernard Metzler , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Bjorn Topel , Magnus Karlsson , Maciej Fijalkowski , Jonathan Lemon , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Christian Brauner , Richard Cochran , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov , Jason Gunthorpe , John Hubbard , Jan Kara , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Pavel Begunkov , Mika Penttila , Dave Chinner , Theodore Ts'o , Peter Xu , Matthew Rosato , "Paul E . McKenney" , Christian Borntraeger , Mike Rapoport References: <1691115d-dba4-636b-d736-6a20359a67c3@redhat.com> <20230502172231.GH1597538@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] mm/gup: disallow FOLL_LONGTERM GUP-fast writing to file-backed mappings In-Reply-To: <20230502172231.GH1597538@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 02.05.23 19:22, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 07:13:49PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> [...] >> >>> +{ >>> + struct address_space *mapping; >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * GUP-fast disables IRQs - this prevents IPIs from causing page tables >>> + * to disappear from under us, as well as preventing RCU grace periods >>> + * from making progress (i.e. implying rcu_read_lock()). >>> + * >>> + * This means we can rely on the folio remaining stable for all >>> + * architectures, both those that set CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE >>> + * and those that do not. >>> + * >>> + * We get the added benefit that given inodes, and thus address_space, >>> + * objects are RCU freed, we can rely on the mapping remaining stable >>> + * here with no risk of a truncation or similar race. >>> + */ >>> + lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled(); >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * If no mapping can be found, this implies an anonymous or otherwise >>> + * non-file backed folio so in this instance we permit the pin. >>> + * >>> + * shmem and hugetlb mappings do not require dirty-tracking so we >>> + * explicitly whitelist these. >>> + * >>> + * Other non dirty-tracked folios will be picked up on the slow path. >>> + */ >>> + mapping = folio_mapping(folio); >>> + return !mapping || shmem_mapping(mapping) || folio_test_hugetlb(folio); >> >> "Folios in the swap cache return the swap mapping" -- you might disallow >> pinning anonymous pages that are in the swap cache. >> >> I recall that there are corner cases where we can end up with an anon page >> that's mapped writable but still in the swap cache ... so you'd fallback to >> the GUP slow path (acceptable for these corner cases, I guess), however >> especially the comment is a bit misleading then. >> >> So I'd suggest not dropping the folio_test_anon() check, or open-coding it >> ... which will make this piece of code most certainly easier to get when >> staring at folio_mapping(). Or to spell it out in the comment (usually I >> prefer code over comments). > > So how stable is folio->mapping at this point? Can two subsequent reads > get different values? (eg. an actual mapping and NULL) > > If so, folio_mapping() itself seems to be missing a READ_ONCE() to avoid > the compiler from emitting the load multiple times. I can only talk about anon pages in this specific call order here (check first, then test if the PTE changed in the meantime): we don't care if we get two different values. If we get a different value the second time, surely we (temporarily) pinned an anon page that is no longer mapped (freed in the meantime). But in that case (even if we read garbage folio->mapping and made the wrong call here), we'll detect afterwards that the PTE changed, and unpin what we (temporarily) pinned. As folio_test_anon() only checks two bits in folio->mapping it's fine, because we won't dereference garbage folio->mapping. With folio_mapping() on !anon and READ_ONCE() ... good question. Kirill said it would be fairly stable, but I suspect that it could change (especially if we call it before validating if the PTE changed as I described further below). Now, if we read folio->mapping after checking if the page we pinned is still mapped (PTE unchanged), at least the page we pinned cannot be reused in the meantime. I suspect that we can still read "NULL" on the second read. But whatever we dereference from the first read should still be valid, even if the second read would have returned NULL ("rcu freeing"). -- Thanks, David / dhildenb