From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@au1.ibm.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Adin Scannell <ascannell@google.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE_FREE
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:36:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <405ba257e730d4f0ad9007490e7ac47cc343c720.camel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180827180458.4af9b2ac@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 880 bytes --]
On Mon, 2018-08-27 at 18:04 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> It could do that. It requires a tlbie that matches the page size,
> so it means 3 sizes. I think possibly even that would be better
> than current code, but we could do better if we had a few specific
> fields in there.
Would it cause a noticeable overhead to keep track
of which page sizes were removed, and to simply flush
the whole TLB in the (unlikely?) event that multiple
page sizes were removed in the same munmap?
Once the unmap is so large that multiple page sizes
were covered, you may already be looking at so many
individual flush operations that a full flush might
be faster.
Is there a point on PPC where simply flushing the
whole TLB, and having other things be reloaded later,
is faster than flushing every individual page mapping
that got unmapped?
--
All Rights Reversed.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-27 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-22 15:30 [PATCH 0/4] x86: TLB invalidate fixes Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-22 15:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/mm/tlb: Revert the recent lazy TLB patches Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-22 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-22 22:11 ` Rik van Riel
2018-08-22 15:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/tlb: Remove tlb_remove_table() non-concurrent condition Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-23 3:31 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 3:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 3:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 4:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 4:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 5:15 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-24 8:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-23 13:40 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-22 15:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE_FREE Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-22 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-23 3:45 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 3:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 4:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 5:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 5:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 4:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-23 5:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 5:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 6:48 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-08-23 5:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-23 6:15 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-23 13:39 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-24 8:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24 11:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24 11:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-27 5:00 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-27 7:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-27 8:04 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-27 8:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-27 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-27 8:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-27 9:02 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-27 22:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-27 13:36 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2018-08-27 14:29 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-27 8:57 ` removig ia64, was: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-27 11:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-27 11:45 ` Jason Duerstock
2018-08-27 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-30 0:13 ` Vineet Gupta
2018-08-30 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24 17:26 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-24 18:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24 18:35 ` TLB flushes on fixmap changes Nadav Amit
2018-08-24 19:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-24 20:24 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-25 0:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-25 2:16 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-25 2:29 ` nadav.amit
2018-08-25 4:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-26 2:23 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-26 4:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-26 4:43 ` Kees Cook
2018-08-26 5:53 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-26 14:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-26 16:47 ` Kees Cook
2018-08-26 17:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-26 20:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-08-26 22:03 ` Kees Cook
2018-08-26 22:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-08-26 22:29 ` Jann Horn
2018-08-26 9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-27 3:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-27 3:26 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 8:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-27 17:34 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 18:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-27 18:54 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 18:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-27 19:10 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 19:43 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 19:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-27 20:16 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 21:55 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 22:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-27 22:54 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 23:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-08-28 8:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-28 17:33 ` Nadav Amit
2018-08-27 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-27 9:39 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-08-27 9:55 ` Jann Horn
2018-08-26 22:48 ` Jann Horn
2018-08-24 8:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE_FREE Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24 13:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24 13:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-24 15:49 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-23 23:31 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-22 21:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-23 8:46 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-22 15:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/mm: Only use tlb_remove_table() for paravirt Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-22 22:12 ` Eduardo Valentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=405ba257e730d4f0ad9007490e7ac47cc343c720.camel@surriel.com \
--to=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=ascannell@google.com \
--cc=benh@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox