linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirk True <ktrue@movaris.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>, Linux-MM@kvack.org
Subject: Re: LTP VM test slower under 2.6.3 than 2.4.20
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:57:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40365887.6020204@movaris.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3800000.1077295177@[10.10.2.4]>

Hi all,

> A kernel profile might help.

Here's the profiles comparing the two versions. I don't understand why 
no "do_page_fault" shows up under 2.4.20 or why "gunzip" does.

Kirk

-------------------------------------------------



2.6.3:

# readprofile -r;./mem01;readprofile -m /boot/System.map-2.6.3 \
       >> captured_profile2.6.3

   1446 poll_idle                                 24.9310
      4 delay_tsc                                  0.1667
     71 do_page_fault                              0.0536
     41 schedule                                   0.0238
     13 __might_sleep                              0.0637
      1 prepare_to_wait                            0.0068
      1 put_files_struct                           0.0042
   3229 do_softirq                                16.3081
      1 run_timer_softirq                          0.0022
   4807 total                                      0.0262



2.4.20:

# readprofile -r;./mem01;readprofile -m /boot/System.map-2.4.20 \
       >> captured_profile2.4.20

    347 gunzip                                     0.1559
      8 acpi_restore_state_mem                     0.0021
      2 proc_dostring                              0.0033
      3 access_process_vm                          0.0054
      2 __mod_timer                                0.0038
      1 del_timer                                  0.0065
      1 update_one_process                         0.0036
      1 notifier_chain_unregister                  0.0052
    365 total                                      0.0020

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-20 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-20 16:36 Kirk True
2004-02-20 16:39 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-20 18:57   ` Kirk True [this message]
2004-02-20 19:03     ` Kirk True
     [not found]   ` <40363DEE.9040608@movaris.com>
     [not found]     ` <5760000.1077296989@[10.10.2.4]>
2004-02-22 15:32       ` Kirk True
2004-02-20 22:45 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-21  2:50   ` Kirk True
2004-02-21  2:50     ` Kirk True
2004-02-21 15:39   ` Kirk True
2004-02-23  7:19 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-23 16:51   ` Kirk True
2004-02-23 19:42     ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-24 15:08     ` Kirk True
2004-02-24 23:38       ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40365887.6020204@movaris.com \
    --to=ktrue@movaris.com \
    --cc=Linux-MM@kvack.org \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox