From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v2 1/3] mm/contig_alloc: support __GFP_COMP
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:29:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <402ff3e5-4fca-4452-97ba-5b1ec4a6eeb1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240814035451.773331-2-yuzhao@google.com>
> +/* Split a multi-block free page into its individual pageblocks. */
> +static void split_large_buddy(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> + unsigned long pfn, int order, fpi_t fpi)
> +{
> + unsigned long end = pfn + (1 << order);
> +
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn, 1 << order));
> + /* Caller removed page from freelist, buddy info cleared! */
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(PageBuddy(page));
> +
> + if (order > pageblock_order)
> + order = pageblock_order;
> +
> + while (pfn != end) {
> + int mt = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
> +
> + __free_one_page(page, pfn, zone, order, mt, fpi);
> + pfn += 1 << order;
> + page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> + }
> +}
Hi,
stumbling over this while digging through the code ....
> +
> static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> unsigned long pfn, unsigned int order,
> fpi_t fpi_flags)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> - int migratetype;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
> - migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
> - __free_one_page(page, pfn, zone, order, migratetype, fpi_flags);
This change is rather undesired:
via __free_pages_core()->__free_pages_ok() we can easily end up here
with order=MAX_PAGE_ORDER.
What your new code will do is split this perfectly reasonable
MAX_PAGE_ORDER chunk via split_large_buddy() into pageblock-sized
chunks, and let the buddy merging logic undo our unnecessary splitting.
Is there a way to avoid this and just process the whole MAX_PAGE_ORDER
chunk like we used to?
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-19 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-14 3:54 [PATCH mm-unstable v2 0/3] mm/hugetlb: alloc/free gigantic folios Yu Zhao
2024-08-14 3:54 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v2 1/3] mm/contig_alloc: support __GFP_COMP Yu Zhao
2024-08-22 8:21 ` Yu Liao
2024-08-22 17:25 ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-22 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2024-08-22 17:23 ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-22 18:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-02 17:02 ` Yu Zhao
2024-11-19 15:29 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-11-19 16:12 ` Zi Yan
2024-11-19 16:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-19 16:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-19 16:41 ` Zi Yan
2024-11-19 16:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-19 16:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 15:55 ` Zi Yan
2024-11-20 16:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-20 16:46 ` Zi Yan
2024-08-14 3:54 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v2 2/3] mm/cma: add cma_{alloc,free}_folio() Yu Zhao
2024-08-22 17:24 ` Yu Zhao
2024-09-02 17:04 ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-14 3:54 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v2 3/3] mm/hugetlb: use __GFP_COMP for gigantic folios Yu Zhao
2024-08-16 15:23 ` Zi Yan
2024-08-16 16:02 ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-16 16:30 ` Zi Yan
2024-08-30 17:55 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v2 0/3] mm/hugetlb: alloc/free " jane.chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=402ff3e5-4fca-4452-97ba-5b1ec4a6eeb1@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox