From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] mm improvements
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 20:42:44 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4020BE94.1040001@cyberone.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4020BDCB.8030707@cyberone.com.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]
Nick Piggin wrote:
> 5/5: vm-tune-throttle.patch
> Try to allocate a bit harder before giving up / throttling on
> writeout.
>
[-- Attachment #2: vm-tune-throttle.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3115 bytes --]
This patch causes try_to_free_pages to wakeup_bdflush even if it has
reclaimed the required # of pages on the first scan.
It allows two scans at the two lowest priorities before breaking out or
doing a blk_congestion_wait, for both try_to_free_pages and balance_pgdat.
linux-2.6-npiggin/mm/vmscan.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~vm-tune-throttle mm/vmscan.c
--- linux-2.6/mm/vmscan.c~vm-tune-throttle 2004-02-04 14:09:46.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6-npiggin/mm/vmscan.c 2004-02-04 14:09:46.000000000 +1100
@@ -930,22 +930,33 @@ int try_to_free_pages(struct zone **zone
if (nr_reclaimed >= nr_pages) {
ret = 1;
+ if (gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)
+ wakeup_bdflush(total_scanned);
goto out;
}
+
+ /* Don't stall on the first run - it might be bad luck */
+ if (likely(priority == DEF_PRIORITY))
+ continue;
+
+ /* Let the caller handle it */
if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_FS))
- break; /* Let the caller handle it */
+ goto out;
+
/*
- * Try to write back as many pages as we just scanned. Not
- * sure if that makes sense, but it's an attempt to avoid
- * creating IO storms unnecessarily
+ * Try to write back as many pages as we just scanned.
+ * Not sure if that makes sense, but it's an attempt
+ * to avoid creating IO storms unnecessarily
*/
wakeup_bdflush(total_scanned);
/* Take a nap, wait for some writeback to complete */
blk_congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
}
- if ((gfp_mask & __GFP_FS) && !(gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY))
+
+ if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY))
out_of_memory();
+
out:
for (i = 0; zones[i] != 0; i++)
zones[i]->prev_priority = zones[i]->temp_priority;
@@ -1004,6 +1015,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgda
if (to_reclaim <= 0)
continue;
}
+ all_zones_ok = 0;
zone->temp_priority = priority;
reclaimed = shrink_zone(zone, GFP_KERNEL,
to_reclaim, &nr_scanned, ps, priority);
@@ -1017,16 +1029,6 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgda
continue;
if (zone->pages_scanned > zone->present_pages * 2)
zone->all_unreclaimable = 1;
- /*
- * If this scan failed to reclaim `to_reclaim' or more
- * pages, we're getting into trouble. Need to scan
- * some more, and throttle kswapd. Note that this zone
- * may now have sufficient free pages due to freeing
- * activity by some other process. That's OK - we'll
- * pick that info up on the next pass through the loop.
- */
- if (reclaimed < to_reclaim)
- all_zones_ok = 0;
}
if (nr_pages && to_free > 0)
continue; /* swsusp: need to do more work */
@@ -1034,9 +1036,11 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgda
break; /* kswapd: all done */
/*
* OK, kswapd is getting into trouble. Take a nap, then take
- * another pass across the zones.
+ * another pass across the zones. Don't stall on the first
+ * pass.
*/
- blk_congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
+ if (priority < DEF_PRIORITY)
+ blk_congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
}
for (i = 0; i < pgdat->nr_zones; i++) {
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-04 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-04 9:39 [PATCH 0/5] " Nick Piggin
2004-02-04 9:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Nick Piggin
2004-02-04 19:45 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-09 7:00 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-09 21:56 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-04 9:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] " Nick Piggin
2004-02-04 10:10 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-04 10:15 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-04 15:27 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-05 2:18 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-04 9:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] " Nick Piggin
2004-02-04 15:28 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-04 16:45 ` Nikita Danilov
2004-02-04 18:53 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-05 2:10 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-04 9:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] " Nick Piggin
2004-02-04 10:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-04 10:19 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-04 9:42 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-02-04 10:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] " Nick Piggin
2004-02-04 10:18 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-04 10:22 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-04 13:25 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Nikita Danilov
2004-02-04 13:53 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-02-04 14:03 ` Nikita Danilov
2004-02-04 15:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-02-04 15:19 ` Nikita Danilov
2004-02-05 2:13 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-05 14:03 ` Nikita Danilov
2004-02-05 15:11 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-05 15:15 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-05 15:20 ` Nikita Danilov
2004-02-05 15:33 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-05 15:46 ` Nikita Danilov
2004-02-05 15:56 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-05 16:03 ` Nikita Danilov
2004-02-05 16:09 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-04 18:33 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-04 20:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-02-04 21:04 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4020BE94.1040001@cyberone.com.au \
--to=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox