From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4020B05E.3080909@cyberone.com.au> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 19:42:06 +1100 From: Nick Piggin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: More VM benchmarks References: <40205908.4080600@cyberone.com.au> <40207B67.7040407@cyberone.com.au> In-Reply-To: <40207B67.7040407@cyberone.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel List-ID: Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Nick Piggin wrote: > >> http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/5/ >> Sorry to keep replying to myself. I've done some runs with my IO scheduler regression tests and these patches don't make a significant difference one way or the other although the results with the patches are generally a bit better. Tested OraSim pgbench nickbench tiobench and the read/ls kernel tree during a streaming read/write. 256MB RAM this time. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org