From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <40207B67.7040407@cyberone.com.au> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 15:56:07 +1100 From: Nick Piggin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: More VM benchmarks References: <40205908.4080600@cyberone.com.au> In-Reply-To: <40205908.4080600@cyberone.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel List-ID: Nick Piggin wrote: > http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/5/ > > OK I'm not too unhappy with kbuild now. I've flattened the > curve a bit more since you last saw it. Would be nice if we > could get j8 and j10 faster but you can't win them all. > > I'm not sure what happens further on - Roger indicates that > perhaps 2.4 overtakes 2.6 again at j24 although the patchset > he used (http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/3/) performs > far worse than this one at j16. This is really not a big > deal IMO, but I might run it and see what happens. > They're about even here at an hour apiece. Thats good, not that I would ever try to optimise for this case... 2.6.2-rc3-mm1-np3 kbuild: make -j24 bzImage 144.45user 31.58system 1:00:08elapsed 4%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (380524major+919600minor)pagefaults 0swaps npiggin@ropeable:~/vm$ cat bkb-24.out 2.4.23 kbuild: make -j24 bzImage 148.41user 43.11system 1:02:41elapsed 5%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (612476major+633988minor)pagefaults 0swaps -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org