From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4020392F.1000709@cyberone.com.au> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 11:13:35 +1100 From: Nick Piggin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: VM benchmarks References: <401D8D64.8010605@cyberone.com.au> <20040201160818.1499be18.akpm@osdl.org> <401D95C2.3080208@cyberone.com.au> <20040202165044.GA8156@k3.hellgate.ch> <401EDAA5.7020802@cyberone.com.au> <20040203231649.GA30715@k3.hellgate.ch> In-Reply-To: <20040203231649.GA30715@k3.hellgate.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Roger Luethi Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Roger Luethi wrote: >On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:17:57 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > >>I have 3 patches here http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/ >>that should apply in order. If you apply to the -mm tree, please >>back out the rss limit patch first. >> >>If you can test them it would be good. >> > >I added results for all 3 patches of yours combined (2.6.1 patched) >and for the reversal patch I posted (2.6.0 revert). Clear improvements >for compiling. Might be interesting to test the patches individually, >but I will likely be unable to conduct further tests til next week. Let >me know if there are any tests you are specifically interested in, >and I will do more testing when I get back. > > Thanks Roger, Hmm results aren't bad... although the active/inactive balance tuning you see here: http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/4/ isn't included (you're testing the green kernel) If I can get things a bit more into shape today I'll post another patchset. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org