From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <401B02A9.90506@cyberone.com.au> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:19:37 +1100 From: Nick Piggin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [BENCHMARKS] 2.6 kbuild results (with add_to_swap patch) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Rik van Riel Cc: Andrew Morton , Nikita Danilov , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Rik van Riel wrote: >On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Nick Piggin wrote: > > >>Small big significantly better on kbuild when tested on top of the other >>two patches (dont-rotate-active-list and my mapped-fair). >> > >Where can I grab those ? > > I've put the all here for now. They are against the latest mm with the RSS patch backed out. http://kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/ >>With this patch as well, we are now as good or better than 2.4 on >>medium and heavy swapping kbuilds and much better than stock 2.6 >>with light swapping loads (not as good as 2.4 but close). >> >>http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/3/ >> > >Neat! Does it have any side effects to interactive >desktop behaviour ? > > To be honest I haven't tried them on my desktop. I would guess they should be fine. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org