From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: manually uninline __memcg_memory_event
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:28:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3h26sozqgksxn4fvh7i6qjhtbnrtzit6eluyieyhsvycs3fbs5@ddblsq2crkit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251022005801.120250-1-sj@kernel.org>
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 05:58:00PM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 16:44:25 -0700 Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> > The function __memcg_memory_event has been unnecessarily marked inline
> > even when it is not really performance critical. It is usually called
> > to track extreme conditions. Over the time, it has evolved to include
> > more functionality and inlining it is causing more harm.
> >
> > Before the patch:
> > $ size mm/memcontrol.o net/ipv4/tcp_input.o net/ipv4/tcp_output.o
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 35645 10574 4192 50411 c4eb mm/memcontrol.o
> > 54738 1658 0 56396 dc4c net/ipv4/tcp_input.o
> > 34644 1065 0 35709 8b7d net/ipv4/tcp_output.o
> >
> > After the patch:
> > $ size mm/memcontrol.o net/ipv4/tcp_input.o net/ipv4/tcp_output.o
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 35137 10446 4192 49775 c26f mm/memcontrol.o
> > 54322 1562 0 55884 da4c net/ipv4/tcp_input.o
> > 34492 1017 0 35509 8ab5 net/ipv4/tcp_output.o
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
> > ---
> > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 32 ++------------------------------
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > index d37e7c93bb8c..8d2e250535a8 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > @@ -1002,36 +1002,8 @@ static inline void count_memcg_event_mm(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > count_memcg_events_mm(mm, idx, 1);
> > }
> >
> > -static inline void __memcg_memory_event(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > - enum memcg_memory_event event,
> > - bool allow_spinning)
> > -{
> > - bool swap_event = event == MEMCG_SWAP_HIGH || event == MEMCG_SWAP_MAX ||
> > - event == MEMCG_SWAP_FAIL;
> > -
> > - /* For now only MEMCG_MAX can happen with !allow_spinning context. */
> > - VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!allow_spinning && event != MEMCG_MAX);
> > -
> > - atomic_long_inc(&memcg->memory_events_local[event]);
> > - if (!swap_event && allow_spinning)
> > - cgroup_file_notify(&memcg->events_local_file);
> > -
> > - do {
> > - atomic_long_inc(&memcg->memory_events[event]);
> > - if (allow_spinning) {
> > - if (swap_event)
> > - cgroup_file_notify(&memcg->swap_events_file);
> > - else
> > - cgroup_file_notify(&memcg->events_file);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
> > - break;
> > - if (cgrp_dfl_root.flags & CGRP_ROOT_MEMORY_LOCAL_EVENTS)
> > - break;
> > - } while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)) &&
> > - !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg));
> > -}
> > +void __memcg_memory_event(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > + enum memcg_memory_event event, bool allow_spinning);
> >
> > static inline void memcg_memory_event(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > enum memcg_memory_event event)
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 1a95049d8b88..93f7c76f0ce9 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -1626,6 +1626,37 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_size(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > return page_counter_read(&memcg->memory);
> > }
> >
> > +void __memcg_memory_event(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > + enum memcg_memory_event event, bool allow_spinning)
>
> Seems this function is called only from memcontrol.c. Why not making it a
> static function?
There is a recent code where this is called (indirectly) from networking
stack for MEMCG_SOCK_THROTTLED.
>
> > +{
> > + bool swap_event = event == MEMCG_SWAP_HIGH || event == MEMCG_SWAP_MAX ||
> > + event == MEMCG_SWAP_FAIL;
> > +
> > + /* For now only MEMCG_MAX can happen with !allow_spinning context. */
> > + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!allow_spinning && event != MEMCG_MAX);
> > +
> > + atomic_long_inc(&memcg->memory_events_local[event]);
> > + if (!swap_event && allow_spinning)
> > + cgroup_file_notify(&memcg->events_local_file);
> > +
> > + do {
> > + atomic_long_inc(&memcg->memory_events[event]);
> > + if (allow_spinning) {
> > + if (swap_event)
> > + cgroup_file_notify(&memcg->swap_events_file);
> > + else
> > + cgroup_file_notify(&memcg->events_file);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
> > + break;
> > + if (cgrp_dfl_root.flags & CGRP_ROOT_MEMORY_LOCAL_EVENTS)
> > + break;
> > + } while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)) &&
> > + !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg));
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__memcg_memory_event);
>
> Also, seems there is no reason to export this symbol?
The networking code needs this export.
Thanks for taking a look.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-21 23:44 Shakeel Butt
2025-10-22 0:58 ` SeongJae Park
2025-10-22 1:28 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2025-10-22 2:15 ` SeongJae Park
2025-10-22 18:10 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-10-23 13:18 ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-23 21:35 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-10-24 6:50 ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-27 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3h26sozqgksxn4fvh7i6qjhtbnrtzit6eluyieyhsvycs3fbs5@ddblsq2crkit \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox