I've sent the updated patches as v3 with your Reviewed-by tag included. Thank you for the review and the suggestion — I'll send v2/v3 as new series going forward. ________________________________ 发件人: Donet Tom 发送时间: 2026年4月16日 13:47:29 收件人: Xiang Gao; akpm@linux-foundation.org; axelrasmussen@google.com; yuanchu@google.com; hannes@cmpxchg.org 抄送: weixugc@google.com; david@kernel.org; mhocko@kernel.org; zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com; shakeel.butt@linux.dev; ljs@kernel.org; baohua@kernel.org; linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 高翔 主题: [External Mail]Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmscan: fix typos in comments [外部邮件] 此邮件来源于小米公司外部，请谨慎处理。若对邮件安全性存疑，请将邮件转发给misec@xiaomi.com进行反馈 Hi On 4/16/26 10:45 AM, Xiang Gao wrote: From: Xiang Gao Fix three typos in comments: - Line 112: "zome_reclaim_mode" -> "zone_reclaim_mode" - Line 6208: "prioities" -> "priorities" - Line 7067: "that that high" -> "that the high" (duplicated word) Signed-off-by: Xiang Gao Reviewed-by: Barry Song It might be better to send v2 as a new series next time —just a suggestion. LGTM Reviewed by: Donet Tom -Donet --- mm/vmscan.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 0fc9373e8251..710fbe1ee151 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ struct scan_control { /* zone_reclaim_mode */ unsigned int may_unmap:1; - /* zome_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim, cgroup restrictions */ + /* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim, cgroup restrictions */ unsigned int may_swap:1; /* Not allow cache_trim_mode to be turned on as part of reclaim? */ @@ -6205,7 +6205,7 @@ static void consider_reclaim_throttle(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc) if (current_is_kswapd() || cgroup_reclaim(sc)) return; - /* Throttle if making no progress at high prioities. */ + /* Throttle if making no progress at high priorities. */ if (sc->priority == 1 && !sc->nr_reclaimed) reclaim_throttle(pgdat, VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS); } @@ -7064,7 +7064,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int highest_zoneidx) /* * There should be no need to raise the scanning priority if - * enough pages are already being scanned that that high + * enough pages are already being scanned that the high * watermark would be met at 100% efficiency. */ if (kswapd_shrink_node(pgdat, &sc))