From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FB1C433EF for ; Thu, 19 May 2022 03:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 028DA6B0073; Wed, 18 May 2022 23:37:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id F1A4E6B0074; Wed, 18 May 2022 23:37:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id DE3856B0075; Wed, 18 May 2022 23:37:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3356B0073 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 23:37:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin23.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A002D32DA7 for ; Thu, 19 May 2022 03:37:37 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79481082954.23.2FC1B65 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) by imf21.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541041C00D0 for ; Thu, 19 May 2022 03:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dggpemm500022.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4L3b5c6Y8nzCshj; Thu, 19 May 2022 11:32:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) by dggpemm500022.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 19 May 2022 11:37:32 +0800 Received: from [10.174.177.243] (10.174.177.243) by dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 19 May 2022 11:37:32 +0800 Message-ID: <3f8fcab1-16ab-8e8e-9d5f-dc8dba7066e3@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 11:37:31 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: Cleanup ioremap() and support ioremap_prot() Content-Language: en-US To: Catalin Marinas , Andrew Morton CC: , , , , , References: <20220429103225.75121-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> From: Kefeng Wang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.243] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 541041C00D0 X-Stat-Signature: 44zxhfpht4amw3f77qrsndegchijou5p Authentication-Results: imf21.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass (imf21.hostedemail.com: domain of wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com designates 45.249.212.189 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam08 X-HE-Tag: 1652931446-419056 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 2022/5/17 6:51, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 06:32:20PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: >> Kefeng Wang (5): >> mm: ioremap: Use more sensibly name in ioremap_prot() >> mm: ioremap: Setup phys_addr of struct vm_struct >> mm: ioremap: Add arch_ioremap/iounmap() >> arm64: mm: Convert to GENERIC_IOREMAP >> arm64: Add HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT support >> >> .../features/vm/ioremap_prot/arch-support.txt | 2 +- >> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 + >> arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h | 20 +++-- >> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 10 +++ >> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 2 +- >> arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 10 --- >> arch/arm64/mm/ioremap.c | 85 +++---------------- >> include/asm-generic/io.h | 16 +++- >> mm/ioremap.c | 27 ++++-- >> 9 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-) > These patches touch the generic mm parts. Andrew, would you like to > merge these patches or are happy for them to go via the arm64 tree. Hi Andrew, what's your preference ;) > Thanks. >