From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 3/6] zsmalloc: make zspage lock preemptible
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:22:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f787832-fbb7-8590-c090-1f511b16449a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250129064853.2210753-4-senozhatsky@chromium.org>
On 29. 01. 25 07:43, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> +/*
> + * zspage lock permits preemption on the reader-side (there can be multiple
> + * readers). Writers (exclusive zspage ownership), on the other hand, are
> + * always run in atomic context and cannot spin waiting for a (potentially
> + * preempted) reader to unlock zspage. This, basically, means that writers
> + * can only call write-try-lock and must bail out if it didn't succeed.
> + *
> + * At the same time, writers cannot reschedule under zspage write-lock,
> + * so readers can spin waiting for the writer to unlock zspage.
> + */
> +static void zspage_read_lock(struct zspage *zspage)
> +{
> + atomic_t *lock = &zspage->lock;
> + int old;
> +
> + while (1) {
> + old = atomic_read(lock);
> + if (old == ZS_PAGE_WRLOCKED) {
> + cpu_relax();
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + if (atomic_try_cmpxchg(lock, &old, old + 1))
> + return;
> +
> + cpu_relax();
> + }
> +}
Please note that atomic_try_cmpxchg updates old variable on failure, so
the whole loop can be rewritten as:
{
atomic_t *lock = &zspage->lock;
int old = atomic_read(lock);
while (1) {
if (old == ZS_PAGE_WRLOCKED) {
cpu_relax();
old = atomic_read(lock);
continue;
}
if (atomic_try_cmpxchg(lock, &old, old + 1))
return;
cpu_relax();
}
}
Please note that cpu_relax() in the cmpxchg() loop is actually harmful
[1] because:
--q--
On the x86-64 architecture even a failing cmpxchg grants exclusive
access to the cacheline, making it preferable to retry the failed op
immediately instead of stalling with the pause instruction.
--/q--
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230113184447.1707316-1-mjguzik@gmail.com/
Based on the above, cpu_relax() should be removed from the loop, which
becomes:
{
atomic_t *lock = &zspage->lock;
int old = atomic_read(lock);
do {
if (old == ZS_PAGE_WRLOCKED) {
cpu_relax();
old = atomic_read(lock);
continue;
}
} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(lock, &old, old + 1));
}
> +static int zspage_try_write_lock(struct zspage *zspage)
This function can be declared as bool, returning true/false.
Uros.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-29 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-29 6:43 [PATCHv1 0/6] zsmalloc: preemptible object mapping Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 6:43 ` [PATCHv1 1/6] zsmalloc: factor out pool locking helpers Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 16:59 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-01-30 4:01 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-30 16:25 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-01-31 3:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 6:43 ` [PATCHv1 2/6] zsmalloc: factor out size-class " Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 17:01 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-01-29 6:43 ` [PATCHv1 3/6] zsmalloc: make zspage lock preemptible Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 11:25 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 15:22 ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2025-01-30 3:22 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 6:43 ` [PATCHv1 4/6] zsmalloc: introduce new object mapping API Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 17:31 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-01-30 3:21 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-30 4:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-30 16:27 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-01-29 6:43 ` [PATCHv1 5/6] zram: switch to new zsmalloc " Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 6:43 ` [PATCHv1 6/6] zram: add might_sleep to zcomp API Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 15:53 ` [PATCHv1 0/6] zsmalloc: preemptible object mapping Yosry Ahmed
2025-01-30 3:13 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3f787832-fbb7-8590-c090-1f511b16449a@gmail.com \
--to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox