linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>,
	Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 3/6] zsmalloc: make zspage lock preemptible
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:22:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f787832-fbb7-8590-c090-1f511b16449a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250129064853.2210753-4-senozhatsky@chromium.org>



On 29. 01. 25 07:43, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:

> +/*
> + * zspage lock permits preemption on the reader-side (there can be multiple
> + * readers).  Writers (exclusive zspage ownership), on the other hand, are
> + * always run in atomic context and cannot spin waiting for a (potentially
> + * preempted) reader to unlock zspage.  This, basically, means that writers
> + * can only call write-try-lock and must bail out if it didn't succeed.
> + *
> + * At the same time, writers cannot reschedule under zspage write-lock,
> + * so readers can spin waiting for the writer to unlock zspage.
> + */
> +static void zspage_read_lock(struct zspage *zspage)
> +{
> +	atomic_t *lock = &zspage->lock;
> +	int old;
> +
> +	while (1) {
> +		old = atomic_read(lock);
> +		if (old == ZS_PAGE_WRLOCKED) {
> +			cpu_relax();
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (atomic_try_cmpxchg(lock, &old, old + 1))
> +			return;
> +
> +		cpu_relax();
> +	}
> +}

Please note that atomic_try_cmpxchg updates old variable on failure, so 
the whole loop can be rewritten as:

{
         atomic_t *lock = &zspage->lock;
         int old = atomic_read(lock);

         while (1) {
                 if (old == ZS_PAGE_WRLOCKED) {
                         cpu_relax();
                         old = atomic_read(lock);
                         continue;
                 }

                 if (atomic_try_cmpxchg(lock, &old, old + 1))
                         return;

                 cpu_relax();
         }
}

Please note that cpu_relax() in the cmpxchg() loop is actually harmful 
[1] because:

--q--
On the x86-64 architecture even a failing cmpxchg grants exclusive
access to the cacheline, making it preferable to retry the failed op
immediately instead of stalling with the pause instruction.
--/q--

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230113184447.1707316-1-mjguzik@gmail.com/

Based on the above, cpu_relax() should be removed from the loop, which 
becomes:

{
         atomic_t *lock = &zspage->lock;
         int old = atomic_read(lock);

         do {
                 if (old == ZS_PAGE_WRLOCKED) {
                         cpu_relax();
                         old = atomic_read(lock);
                         continue;
                 }

         } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(lock, &old, old + 1));
  }

> +static int zspage_try_write_lock(struct zspage *zspage)

This function can be declared as bool, returning true/false.

Uros.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-29 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-29  6:43 [PATCHv1 0/6] zsmalloc: preemptible object mapping Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29  6:43 ` [PATCHv1 1/6] zsmalloc: factor out pool locking helpers Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 16:59   ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-01-30  4:01     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-30 16:25       ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-01-31  3:34         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29  6:43 ` [PATCHv1 2/6] zsmalloc: factor out size-class " Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 17:01   ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-01-29  6:43 ` [PATCHv1 3/6] zsmalloc: make zspage lock preemptible Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 11:25   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 15:22   ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2025-01-30  3:22     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29  6:43 ` [PATCHv1 4/6] zsmalloc: introduce new object mapping API Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 17:31   ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-01-30  3:21     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-30  4:17       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-30 16:27       ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-01-29  6:43 ` [PATCHv1 5/6] zram: switch to new zsmalloc " Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29  6:43 ` [PATCHv1 6/6] zram: add might_sleep to zcomp API Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-01-29 15:53 ` [PATCHv1 0/6] zsmalloc: preemptible object mapping Yosry Ahmed
2025-01-30  3:13   ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3f787832-fbb7-8590-c090-1f511b16449a@gmail.com \
    --to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox