From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: 禹舟键 <ufo19890607@gmail.com>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, corbet@lwn.net, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: cgroup: correct the wrong information about measure of memory pressure
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:54:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3edd7008-d568-f9b1-a991-bd0ee88f6c52@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHCio2g-S6snHsh84r0Wp1RQW1CR3t_eyUUjcdDaxnUHWTcdFw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/19/19 2:45 AM, 禹舟键 wrote:
> Hi TeJun
> I've built the 5.0.0-rc6 kernel with psi option, but I cannot find any
> cgroup.controllers when I mounted cgroup2.
>
> [root@bogon /]# uname -r
> [root@bogon /]# 5.0.0-rc6+
> [root@bogon /]# mount -t cgroup2 none cgroup2/
> [root@bogon /]# cat cgroup2/cgroup.controllers
> [root@bogon /]
> [root@bogon /]# cat cgroup2/cgroup.subtree_control
> [root@bogon /]#
>
> What's wrong with this kernel? Or maybe I lost some mount option?
I'm not sure what you did before you mounted cgroup2, but if you have
legacy controllers mounted, you have to unmount them, otherwise
cgroup.controllers would show up as empty. Or you can pass
"cgroup_no_v1=" in your kernel parameter.
Yang
>
> Thanks
> Yuzhoujian
>
> Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> 于2019年2月19日周二 上午10:32写道:
>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 08:56:04AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> Since PSI has implemented some kind of measure of memory pressure, the
>>> statement about lack of such measure is not true anymore.
>>>
>>> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
>>> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 3 +--
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
>>> index 7bf3f12..9a92013 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
>>> @@ -1310,8 +1310,7 @@ network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
>>> performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
>>> pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
>>> memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
>>> -memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
>>> -implemented yet.
>>> +memory.
>> Maybe refer to PSI?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-21 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-16 0:56 Yang Shi
2019-02-18 21:05 ` Tejun Heo
2019-02-19 10:45 ` 禹舟键
2019-02-21 19:54 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2019-02-19 16:47 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3edd7008-d568-f9b1-a991-bd0ee88f6c52@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ufo19890607@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox