From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@tarantool.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_idle_get_page() does not need zone_lru_lock
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 14:07:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e48f802-b489-a052-f703-dd456ffeda46@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161207110845.GA4655@esperanza>
On 12/07/2016 12:08 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:55:10PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>> Rechecking PageLRU() after get_page_unless_zero() may have value, but
>> holding zone_lru_lock around that serves no useful purpose: delete it.
>
> IIRC this lock/unlock was added on purpose, by request from Minchan. It
> serves as a barrier that guarantees that all page fields (specifically
> ->mapping in case of anonymous pages) have been properly initialized by
> the time we pass it to rmap_walk(). Here's a reference to the thread
> where this problem was discussed:
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20150430082531.GD21771@blaptop>
Um OK, but then there should have been a comment explaining why the lock
is there :/
Vlastimil
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
>> ---
>>
>> mm/page_idle.c | 4 ----
>> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- 4.9-rc8/mm/page_idle.c 2016-10-02 16:24:33.000000000 -0700
>> +++ linux/mm/page_idle.c 2016-12-05 19:44:32.646625435 -0800
>> @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@
>> static struct page *page_idle_get_page(unsigned long pfn)
>> {
>> struct page *page;
>> - struct zone *zone;
>>
>> if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
>> return NULL;
>> @@ -40,13 +39,10 @@ static struct page *page_idle_get_page(u
>> !get_page_unless_zero(page))
>> return NULL;
>>
>> - zone = page_zone(page);
>> - spin_lock_irq(zone_lru_lock(zone));
>> if (unlikely(!PageLRU(page))) {
>> put_page(page);
>> page = NULL;
>> }
>> - spin_unlock_irq(zone_lru_lock(zone));
>> return page;
>> }
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-07 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-06 5:55 Hugh Dickins
2016-12-07 8:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-12-07 11:08 ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-12-07 13:07 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e48f802-b489-a052-f703-dd456ffeda46@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov@tarantool.org \
--cc=xemul@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox