From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
anup@brainfault.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, seanjc@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, xiaoyao.li@intel.com,
yilun.xu@intel.com, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,
jarkko@kernel.org, amoorthy@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com,
mic@digikod.net, vbabka@suse.cz, vannapurve@google.com,
ackerleytng@google.com, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name,
david@redhat.com, michael.roth@amd.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
liam.merwick@oracle.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
steven.price@arm.com, quic_eberman@quicinc.com,
quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com, quic_tsoni@quicinc.com,
quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com, quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com,
quic_pderrin@quicinc.com, quic_pheragu@quicinc.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, maz@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, keirf@google.com,
roypat@amazon.co.uk, shuah@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
jgg@nvidia.com, rientjes@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
fvdl@google.com, hughd@google.com, jthoughton@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 04/15] KVM: guest_memfd: Track mappability within a struct kvm_gmem_private
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 15:31:56 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e1780db-6e39-4508-8ce5-4d28771400e8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250117163001.2326672-5-tabba@google.com>
Hi Fuad,
On 1/18/25 2:29 AM, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
>
> Track whether guest_memfd memory can be mapped within the inode,
> since it is property of the guest_memfd's memory contents.
>
> The guest_memfd PRIVATE memory attribute is not used for two
> reasons. First because it reflects the userspace expectation for
> that memory location, and therefore can be toggled by userspace.
> The second is, although each guest_memfd file has a 1:1 binding
> with a KVM instance, the plan is to allow multiple files per
> inode, e.g. to allow intra-host migration to a new KVM instance,
> without destroying guest_memfd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
> Co-developed-by: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
> Co-developed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> index 6453658d2650..0a7b6cf8bd8f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,17 @@ struct kvm_gmem {
> struct list_head entry;
> };
>
> +struct kvm_gmem_inode_private {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_MAPPABLE
> + struct xarray mappable_offsets;
> +#endif
> +};
> +
> +static struct kvm_gmem_inode_private *kvm_gmem_private(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + return inode->i_mapping->i_private_data;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * folio_file_pfn - like folio_file_page, but return a pfn.
> * @folio: The folio which contains this index.
> @@ -312,8 +323,28 @@ static pgoff_t kvm_gmem_get_index(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
> return gfn - slot->base_gfn + slot->gmem.pgoff;
> }
>
> +static void kvm_gmem_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + struct kvm_gmem_inode_private *private = kvm_gmem_private(inode);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_MAPPABLE
> + /*
> + * .evict_inode can be called before private data is set up if there are
> + * issues during inode creation.
> + */
> + if (private)
> + xa_destroy(&private->mappable_offsets);
> +#endif
> +
> + truncate_inode_pages_final(inode->i_mapping);
> +
> + kfree(private);
> + clear_inode(inode);
> +}
> +
> static const struct super_operations kvm_gmem_super_operations = {
> - .statfs = simple_statfs,
> + .statfs = simple_statfs,
> + .evict_inode = kvm_gmem_evict_inode,
> };
>
As I understood, ->destroy_inode() may be more suitable place where the xarray is
released. ->evict_inode() usually detach the inode from the existing struct, to make
it offline. ->destroy_inode() is actually the place where the associated resource
(memory) is relased.
Another benefit with ->destroy_inode() is we're not concerned to truncate_inode_pages_final()
and clear_inode().
> static int kvm_gmem_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
> @@ -440,6 +471,7 @@ static struct inode *kvm_gmem_inode_make_secure_inode(const char *name,
> loff_t size, u64 flags)
> {
> const struct qstr qname = QSTR_INIT(name, strlen(name));
> + struct kvm_gmem_inode_private *private;
> struct inode *inode;
> int err;
>
> @@ -448,10 +480,19 @@ static struct inode *kvm_gmem_inode_make_secure_inode(const char *name,
> return inode;
>
> err = security_inode_init_security_anon(inode, &qname, NULL);
> - if (err) {
> - iput(inode);
> - return ERR_PTR(err);
> - }
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + private = kzalloc(sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!private)
> + goto out;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_MAPPABLE
> + xa_init(&private->mappable_offsets);
> +#endif
> +
> + inode->i_mapping->i_private_data = private;
>
The whole block of code needs to be guarded by CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_MAPPABLE because
kzalloc(sizeof(...)) is translated to kzalloc(0) when CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_MAPPABLE
is disabled, and kzalloc() will always fail. It will lead to unusable guest-memfd
if CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_MAPPABLE is disabled.
> inode->i_private = (void *)(unsigned long)flags;
> inode->i_op = &kvm_gmem_iops;
> @@ -464,6 +505,11 @@ static struct inode *kvm_gmem_inode_make_secure_inode(const char *name,
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!mapping_unevictable(inode->i_mapping));
>
> return inode;
> +
> +out:
> + iput(inode);
> +
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> }
>
> static struct file *kvm_gmem_inode_create_getfile(void *priv, loff_t size,
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-24 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 16:29 [RFC PATCH v5 00/15] KVM: Restricted mapping of guest_memfd at the host and arm64 support Fuad Tabba
2025-01-17 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v5 01/15] mm: Consolidate freeing of typed folios on final folio_put() Fuad Tabba
2025-01-17 22:05 ` Elliot Berman
2025-01-19 14:39 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-01-20 10:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-20 10:50 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-01-20 10:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-20 10:43 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-01-20 10:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-01-20 11:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-01-20 11:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-17 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v5 02/15] KVM: guest_memfd: Make guest mem use guest mem inodes instead of anonymous inodes Fuad Tabba
2025-01-24 4:25 ` Gavin Shan
2025-01-29 10:12 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 15:58 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-01-17 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v5 03/15] KVM: guest_memfd: Introduce kvm_gmem_get_pfn_locked(), which retains the folio lock Fuad Tabba
2025-01-17 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v5 04/15] KVM: guest_memfd: Track mappability within a struct kvm_gmem_private Fuad Tabba
2025-01-24 5:31 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2025-01-29 10:15 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-26 22:29 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-01-17 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v5 05/15] KVM: guest_memfd: Folio mappability states and functions that manage their transition Fuad Tabba
2025-01-20 10:30 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-01-20 10:40 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-06 3:14 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-02-06 9:45 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-19 23:33 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-02-20 9:26 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-01-17 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v5 06/15] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle final folio_put() of guestmem pages Fuad Tabba
2025-01-20 11:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-01-20 12:14 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-01-22 22:24 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-01-23 11:00 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-06 3:18 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-02-06 3:28 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-02-06 9:47 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-01-30 14:23 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-01-22 22:16 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-01-23 9:50 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-05 1:28 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-02-05 4:31 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-02-05 5:58 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-02-05 0:42 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-02-05 10:06 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-05 17:39 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-02-05 17:42 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-02-07 10:46 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-02-10 16:04 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-05 0:51 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-02-05 10:07 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-06 3:37 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-02-06 9:49 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-01-17 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v5 07/15] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to mmap guest_memfd() pages when shared Fuad Tabba
2025-01-17 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v5 08/15] KVM: guest_memfd: Add guest_memfd support to kvm_(read|/write)_guest_page() Fuad Tabba
2025-01-17 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v5 09/15] KVM: guest_memfd: Add KVM capability to check if guest_memfd is host mappable Fuad Tabba
2025-01-17 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v5 10/15] KVM: guest_memfd: Add a guest_memfd() flag to initialize it as mappable Fuad Tabba
2025-01-17 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v5 11/15] KVM: guest_memfd: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed Fuad Tabba
2025-01-17 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v5 12/15] KVM: arm64: Skip VMA checks for slots without userspace address Fuad Tabba
2025-01-17 16:29 ` [RFC PATCH v5 13/15] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() calculation of force_pte Fuad Tabba
2025-01-17 16:30 ` [RFC PATCH v5 14/15] KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd()-backed guest page faults Fuad Tabba
2025-01-17 16:30 ` [RFC PATCH v5 15/15] KVM: arm64: Enable guest_memfd private memory when pKVM is enabled Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e1780db-6e39-4508-8ce5-4d28771400e8@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amoorthy@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pderrin@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pheragu@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox