From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Ignacio.MorenoGonzalez@kuka.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: mmap: map MAP_STACK to VM_NOHUGEPAGE only if THP is enabled
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 14:12:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3de8814b-9964-489c-8d13-feb319623b82@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBTCtOXBhUK_FLU6@casper.infradead.org>
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 02:03:48PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 11:31:41AM +0200, Ignacio Moreno Gonzalez via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Ignacio Moreno Gonzalez <Ignacio.MorenoGonzalez@kuka.com>
> >
> > commit c4608d1bf7c6 ("mm: mmap: map MAP_STACK to VM_NOHUGEPAGE") maps
> > the mmap option MAP_STACK to VM_NOHUGEPAGE. This is also done if
> > CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGETABLES is not defined. But in that case, the
> > VM_NOHUGEPAGE does not make sense. For instance, when calling madvise()
> > with MADV_NOHUGEPAGE, an error is always returned.
>
> Isn't that the real problem though?
Hmm, but wouldn't we want users who are trying to set MADV_[NO]HUGEPAGE to
be made aware that it isn't going to do anything?
And wouldn't changing this be a possibly 'breaking userspace' thing if
somebody somewhere relies on this?
Also this will make this inconsistent with e.g. MADV_COLLAPSE also?
I guess you could argue MADV_NOHUGEPAGE with !THP is just a no-op... But
definitely not MADV_HUGEPAGE.
Another angle to this as well is - we are causing these VMAs to have a
pointless VMA flag set that presumably can't be set any other way.
So I do think the proposed solution is right, and is the least impactful
one.
>
> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> @@ -596,6 +596,8 @@ static inline bool unmap_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> static inline int hugepage_madvise(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long *vm_flags, int advice)
> {
> + if (advice == MADV_NOHUGEPAGE)
> + return 0;
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-02 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-02 9:31 Ignacio Moreno Gonzalez via B4 Relay
2025-05-02 12:46 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-02 20:53 ` Yang Shi
2025-05-03 9:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-05 17:53 ` Yang Shi
2025-05-06 12:26 ` Ignacio Moreno Gonzalez
2025-05-02 13:03 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-05-02 13:12 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2025-05-02 14:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-05-02 14:24 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3de8814b-9964-489c-8d13-feb319623b82@lucifer.local \
--to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=Ignacio.MorenoGonzalez@kuka.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox