linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>, <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	<willy@infradead.org>, <ying.huang@intel.com>, <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	<minchan@kernel.org>, <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <o451686892@gmail.com>,
	<jhubbard@nvidia.com>, <peterx@redhat.com>,
	<naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>, <mhocko@suse.com>, <riel@redhat.com>,
	<osalvador@suse.de>, <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm/migration: fix potential pte_unmap on an not mapped pte
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:55:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3dc955b1-43c9-487a-b1e6-f0f128da7722@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a190e78f-d833-780b-6fbe-b129c2505deb@redhat.com>

On 2022/4/11 19:41, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 09.04.22 09:38, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> __migration_entry_wait and migration_entry_wait_on_locked assume pte is
>> always mapped from caller. But this is not the case when it's called from
>> migration_entry_wait_huge and follow_huge_pmd. And a parameter unmap to
>> indicate whether pte needs to be unmapped to fix this issue.
> 
> Hm.
> 
> 
> migration_entry_wait_on_locked documents
> 
> "@ptep: mapped pte pointer. Will return with the ptep unmapped. Only
> required for pte entries, pass NULL for pmd entries."
> 
> Setting ptep implies that we have a *mapped pte* pointer that requires unmap.
> If some code sets that although that's not guaranteed, that calling code
> is wrong and needs to be fixed to not pass a ptep.
> 
> 
> hugetlbfs never requires a map/unmap. I really don't see we there is need to
> adjust migration_entry_wait_on_locked(): just don't pass a ptep as documented.
> 
> What's really nasty here is that hugetlbfs actually mostly works on PMD/PUD,
> but we call it PTEs. One corner case might be CONT PTEs, but they are also
> accessed without a map+unmap.
> 
> Regarding __migration_entry_wait(), I think we should just stop using it for
> hugetlbfs and have a proper hugetlbfs variant that calls
> hugetlb_migration_entry_wait(ptep == NULL), and knows that although we're
> handling ptes, we're usually not actually holding ptes in our hands
> that need a map+unmap.
> 
> 
> Something like (including some cleanups mm parameter):

This really helps! Many thanks! Will try to do this in next version. :)

> 
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/swapops.h b/include/linux/swapops.h
> index 32d517a28969..898c407ad8f7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swapops.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swapops.h
> @@ -234,8 +234,8 @@ extern void __migration_entry_wait(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *ptep,
>  					spinlock_t *ptl);
>  extern void migration_entry_wait(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
>  					unsigned long address);
> -extern void migration_entry_wait_huge(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> -		struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte);
> +extern void __migration_entry_wait_huge(pte_t *ptep, spinlock_t *ptl);
> +extern void migration_entry_wait_huge(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t *pte);
>  #else
>  static inline swp_entry_t make_readable_migration_entry(pgoff_t offset)
>  {
> @@ -261,8 +261,9 @@ static inline void __migration_entry_wait(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *ptep,
>  					spinlock_t *ptl) { }
>  static inline void migration_entry_wait(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
>  					 unsigned long address) { }
> +static inline void __migration_entry_wait_huge(pte_t *ptep, spinlock_t *ptl) { }
>  static inline void migration_entry_wait_huge(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> -		struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte) { }
> +					     pte_t *pte) { }
>  static inline int is_writable_migration_entry(swp_entry_t entry)
>  {
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 48740e6c3476..2b38eaaa2e60 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -5622,7 +5622,7 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		 */
>  		entry = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
>  		if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_migration(entry))) {
> -			migration_entry_wait_huge(vma, mm, ptep);
> +			migration_entry_wait_huge(vma, ptep);
>  			return 0;
>  		} else if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(entry)))
>  			return VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE |
> @@ -6770,7 +6770,7 @@ follow_huge_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>  	} else {
>  		if (is_hugetlb_entry_migration(pte)) {
>  			spin_unlock(ptl);
> -			__migration_entry_wait(mm, (pte_t *)pmd, ptl);
> +			__migration_entry_wait_huge((pte_t *)pmd, ptl);
>  			goto retry;
>  		}
>  		/*
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 231907e89b93..84b685a235fe 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -315,11 +315,26 @@ void migration_entry_wait(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
>  	__migration_entry_wait(mm, ptep, ptl);
>  }
>  
> +void __migration_entry_wait_huge(pte_t *ptep, spinlock_t *ptl)
> +{
> +	swp_entry_t entry;
> +	pte_t pte;
> +
> +	spin_lock(ptl);
> +	pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!is_hugetlb_entry_migration(pte)))
> +		spin_unlock(ptl);
> +	else
> +		migration_entry_wait_on_locked(pte_to_swp_entry(pte), NULL, ptl);
> +}
> +
>  void migration_entry_wait_huge(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte)
>  {
> -	spinlock_t *ptl = huge_pte_lockptr(hstate_vma(vma), mm, pte);
> -	__migration_entry_wait(mm, pte, ptl);
> +	spinlock_t *ptl = huge_pte_lockptr(hstate_vma(vma), vma->mm, pte);
> +
> +	__migration_entry_wait_huge(pte, ptl);
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-12  2:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-09  7:38 [PATCH 0/4] A few cleanup and fixup patches for migration Miaohe Lin
2022-04-09  7:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/migration: reduce the rcu lock duration Miaohe Lin
2022-04-11 14:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-12  2:07   ` ying.huang
2022-04-12  3:21     ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-09  7:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/migration: remove unneeded lock page and PageMovable check Miaohe Lin
2022-04-11 14:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-09  7:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/migration: return errno when isolate_huge_page failed Miaohe Lin
2022-04-11 14:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-12  3:13     ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-09  7:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/migration: fix potential pte_unmap on an not mapped pte Miaohe Lin
2022-04-09 11:38   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-11  1:54     ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-11 11:41   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-12  2:55     ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2022-04-12  2:25 ` [PATCH 0/4] A few cleanup and fixup patches for migration ying.huang
2022-04-12  3:29   ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-12  6:33     ` ying.huang
2022-04-12  8:59       ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-12  7:00     ` ying.huang
2022-04-12  9:06       ` Miaohe Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3dc955b1-43c9-487a-b1e6-f0f128da7722@huawei.com \
    --to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=o451686892@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox