linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
	baohua@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/2] mm/huge_memory: cache folio attribute in __split_unmapped_folio()
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 10:46:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d4b9f1d-a420-4961-ada5-355b60909d4a@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251016004613.514-2-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>

I don't like 'cache' here. You're not cache-ing anything, you're relying on an
attribute remaining constant.

Something like 'avoid reinvoking folio_test_anon()' would be simpler.

On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 12:46:12AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
> During the execution of __split_unmapped_folio(), the folio's anon/!anon
> attribute is invariant (not expected to change).
>
> Therefore, it is safe and more efficient to retrieve this attribute once
> at the start and reuse it throughout the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: wang lian <lianux.mm@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/huge_memory.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 3c74227cc847..4b2d5a7e5c8e 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3527,6 +3527,7 @@ static int __split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, int new_order,
>  		struct page *split_at, struct xa_state *xas,
>  		struct address_space *mapping, bool uniform_split)
>  {
> +	bool is_anon = folio_test_anon(folio);

As David said, make this const please.

>  	int order = folio_order(folio);
>  	int start_order = uniform_split ? new_order : order - 1;
>  	bool stop_split = false;
> @@ -3534,7 +3535,7 @@ static int __split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, int new_order,
>  	int split_order;
>  	int ret = 0;
>
> -	if (folio_test_anon(folio))
> +	if (is_anon)
>  		mod_mthp_stat(order, MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON, -1);
>
>  	folio_clear_has_hwpoisoned(folio);
> @@ -3551,7 +3552,7 @@ static int __split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, int new_order,
>  		struct folio *new_folio;
>
>  		/* order-1 anonymous folio is not supported */
> -		if (folio_test_anon(folio) && split_order == 1)
> +		if (is_anon && split_order == 1)
>  			continue;
>  		if (uniform_split && split_order != new_order)
>  			continue;
> @@ -3603,7 +3604,7 @@ static int __split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, int new_order,
>  				if (split_order != new_order && !stop_split)
>  					continue;
>  			}
> -			if (folio_test_anon(new_folio))
> +			if (is_anon)
>  				mod_mthp_stat(folio_order(new_folio),
>  					      MTHP_STAT_NR_ANON, 1);
>  		}
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-17  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-16  0:46 [Patch v2 0/2] mm/huge_memory: cleanup __split_unmapped_folio() Wei Yang
2025-10-16  0:46 ` [Patch v2 1/2] mm/huge_memory: cache folio attribute in __split_unmapped_folio() Wei Yang
2025-10-16  1:34   ` Barry Song
2025-10-16 20:01   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-17  9:46   ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2025-10-19  7:51     ` Wei Yang
2025-10-16  0:46 ` [Patch v2 2/2] mm/huge_memory: Optimize and simplify __split_unmapped_folio() logic Wei Yang
2025-10-16  1:25   ` wang lian
2025-10-16 20:10   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-16 20:22     ` Zi Yan
2025-10-16 20:55       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-16 20:56         ` Zi Yan
2025-10-17  0:55   ` Wei Yang
2025-10-17  9:44   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-17 14:26     ` Zi Yan
2025-10-17 14:29       ` Zi Yan
2025-10-17 14:44       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-17 14:45       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-17 14:55         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-17 17:24           ` Zi Yan
2025-10-20 14:03             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-20 14:28               ` Zi Yan
2025-10-21  0:30               ` Wei Yang
2025-10-21  9:17                 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-19  8:00           ` Wei Yang
2025-10-20 11:55             ` Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3d4b9f1d-a420-4961-ada5-355b60909d4a@lucifer.local \
    --to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox