Hi

On 4/16/26 10:45 AM, Xiang Gao wrote:
> From: Xiang Gao<gaoxiang17@xiaomi.com>
>
> Fix three typos in comments:
>
> - Line 112: "zome_reclaim_mode" -> "zone_reclaim_mode"
> - Line 6208: "prioities" -> "priorities"
> - Line 7067: "that that high" -> "that the high" (duplicated word)
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiang Gao<gaoxiang17@xiaomi.com>
> Reviewed-by: Barry Song<baohua@kernel.org>
>
>

It might be better to send v2 as a new series next time —just a suggestion.

LGTM Reviewed by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com> -Donet


> ---
>   mm/vmscan.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 0fc9373e8251..710fbe1ee151 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ struct scan_control {
>   	/* zone_reclaim_mode */
>   	unsigned int may_unmap:1;
>   
> -	/* zome_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim, cgroup restrictions */
> +	/* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim, cgroup restrictions */
>   	unsigned int may_swap:1;
>   
>   	/* Not allow cache_trim_mode to be turned on as part of reclaim? */
> @@ -6205,7 +6205,7 @@ static void consider_reclaim_throttle(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
>   	if (current_is_kswapd() || cgroup_reclaim(sc))
>   		return;
>   
> -	/* Throttle if making no progress at high prioities. */
> +	/* Throttle if making no progress at high priorities. */
>   	if (sc->priority == 1 && !sc->nr_reclaimed)
>   		reclaim_throttle(pgdat, VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS);
>   }
> @@ -7064,7 +7064,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int highest_zoneidx)
>   
>   		/*
>   		 * There should be no need to raise the scanning priority if
> -		 * enough pages are already being scanned that that high
> +		 * enough pages are already being scanned that the high
>   		 * watermark would be met at 100% efficiency.
>   		 */
>   		if (kswapd_shrink_node(pgdat, &sc))