From: Toshiki Fukasawa <t-fukasawa@vx.jp.nec.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Toshiki Fukasawa <t-fukasawa@vx.jp.nec.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"mhocko@kernel.org" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"adobriyan@gmail.com" <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"longman@redhat.com" <longman@redhat.com>,
"sfr@canb.auug.org.au" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] mm: initialize struct pages reserved by ZONE_DEVICE driver.
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:32:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d27953a-88b8-5a7c-de3c-041f8b4436f6@vx.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38e58d23-c20b-4e68-5f56-20bba2be2d6c@redhat.com>
On 2019/09/17 16:13, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 17.09.19 04:34, Toshiki Fukasawa wrote:
>> On 2019/09/09 16:46, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> Let's take a step back here to understand the issues I am aware of. I
>>> think we should solve this for good now:
>>>
>>> A PFN walker takes a look at a random PFN at a random point in time. It
>>> finds a PFN with SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT && !SECTION_IS_ONLINE. The
>>> options are:
>>>
>>> 1. It is buddy memory (add_memory()) that has not been online yet. The
>>> memmap contains garbage. Don't access.
>>>
>>> 2. It is ZONE_DEVICE memory with a valid memmap. Access it.
>>>
>>> 3. It is ZONE_DEVICE memory with an invalid memmap, because the section
>>> is only partially present: E.g., device starts at offset 64MB within a
>>> section or the device ends at offset 64MB within a section. Don't access it.
>>
>> I don't agree with case #3. In the case, struct page area is not allocated on
>> ZONE_DEVICE, but is allocated on system memory. So I think we can access the
>> struct pages. What do you mean "invalid memmap"?
> No, that's not the case. There is no memory, especially not system
> memory. We only allow partially present sections (sub-section memory
> hotplug) for ZONE_DEVICE.
Let me clear my thoughts. If I read correctly, the struct pages for sections
(including partially present sections) on ZONE_DEVICE are allocated by
vmemmap_populate(). And all the struct pages except (altmap->base_pfn) to
(altmap->base_pfn + altmap->reserve) are initialized by memmap_init_zone()
and memmap_init_zone_device().
Do struct pages for partially present sections go through a different process?
Thanks,
Toshiki Fukasawa
>
> invalid memmap == memmap was not initialized == struct pages contains
> garbage. There is a memmap, but accessing it (e.g., pfn_to_nid()) will
> trigger a BUG.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-17 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-06 8:09 Toshiki Fukasawa
2019-09-06 8:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-06 10:02 ` Toshiki Fukasawa
2019-09-06 10:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-09 5:48 ` Toshiki Fukasawa
2019-09-09 7:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-09 8:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-09 11:53 ` Dan Williams
2019-09-09 12:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-10 9:21 ` Dan Williams
2019-09-10 10:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-17 2:34 ` Toshiki Fukasawa
2019-09-17 7:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-17 9:32 ` Toshiki Fukasawa [this message]
2019-09-17 10:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-18 2:16 ` Toshiki Fukasawa
2019-09-17 15:49 ` Waiman Long
2019-09-17 16:21 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-17 17:04 ` Waiman Long
2019-09-17 20:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-18 2:28 ` Toshiki Fukasawa
2019-09-18 7:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-10 14:01 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-10 14:53 ` Dan Williams
2019-09-10 17:35 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d27953a-88b8-5a7c-de3c-041f8b4436f6@vx.jp.nec.com \
--to=t-fukasawa@vx.jp.nec.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox