From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org,
aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, bp@alien8.de, broonie@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maz@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com,
npiggin@gmail.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, shuah@kernel.org,
szabolcs.nagy@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, will@kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/29] arm64: context switch POR_EL0 register
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:57:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c655663-3407-4602-a958-c5382a6b3133@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240503130147.1154804-7-joey.gouly@arm.com>
On 5/3/24 18:31, Joey Gouly wrote:
> POR_EL0 is a register that can be modified by userspace directly,
> so it must be context switched.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 8b904a757bd3..d46aab23e06e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -832,6 +832,12 @@ static inline bool system_supports_lpa2(void)
> return cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_LPA2);
> }
>
> +static inline bool system_supports_poe(void)
> +{
> + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_POE) &&
CONFIG_ARM64_POE has not been defined/added until now ?
> + alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_HAS_S1POE);
> +}
> +
> int do_emulate_mrs(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 sys_reg, u32 rt);
> bool try_emulate_mrs(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 isn);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> index f77371232d8c..e6376f979273 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ struct thread_struct {
> u64 sctlr_user;
> u64 svcr;
> u64 tpidr2_el0;
> + u64 por_el0;
> };
As there going to be a new config i.e CONFIG_ARM64_POE, should not this
register be wrapped up with #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_POE as well ? Similarly
access into p->thread.por_el0 should also be conditional on that config.
>
> static inline unsigned int thread_get_vl(struct thread_struct *thread,
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 9e8999592f3a..62c399811dbf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -1064,6 +1064,9 @@
> #define POE_RXW UL(0x7)
> #define POE_MASK UL(0xf)
>
> +/* Initial value for Permission Overlay Extension for EL0 */
> +#define POR_EL0_INIT POE_RXW
The idea behind POE_RXW as the init value is to be all permissive ?
> +
> #define ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS 4
>
> /* Defined for compatibility only, do not add new users. */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> index 4ae31b7af6c3..0ffaca98bed6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> @@ -271,12 +271,23 @@ static void flush_tagged_addr_state(void)
> clear_thread_flag(TIF_TAGGED_ADDR);
> }
>
> +static void flush_poe(void)
> +{
> + if (!system_supports_poe())
> + return;
> +
> + write_sysreg_s(POR_EL0_INIT, SYS_POR_EL0);
> + /* ISB required for kernel uaccess routines when chaning POR_EL0 */
> + isb();
> +}
> +
> void flush_thread(void)
> {
> fpsimd_flush_thread();
> tls_thread_flush();
> flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(current);
> flush_tagged_addr_state();
> + flush_poe();
> }
>
> void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
> @@ -371,6 +382,9 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
> if (system_supports_tpidr2())
> p->thread.tpidr2_el0 = read_sysreg_s(SYS_TPIDR2_EL0);
>
> + if (system_supports_poe())
> + p->thread.por_el0 = read_sysreg_s(SYS_POR_EL0);
> +
> if (stack_start) {
> if (is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(p)))
> childregs->compat_sp = stack_start;
> @@ -495,6 +509,19 @@ static void erratum_1418040_new_exec(void)
> preempt_enable();
> }
>
> +static void permission_overlay_switch(struct task_struct *next)
> +{
> + if (!system_supports_poe())
> + return;
> +
> + current->thread.por_el0 = read_sysreg_s(SYS_POR_EL0);
> + if (current->thread.por_el0 != next->thread.por_el0) {
> + write_sysreg_s(next->thread.por_el0, SYS_POR_EL0);
> + /* ISB required for kernel uaccess routines when chaning POR_EL0 */
> + isb();
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * __switch_to() checks current->thread.sctlr_user as an optimisation. Therefore
> * this function must be called with preemption disabled and the update to
> @@ -530,6 +557,7 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
> ssbs_thread_switch(next);
> erratum_1418040_thread_switch(next);
> ptrauth_thread_switch_user(next);
> + permission_overlay_switch(next);
>
> /*
> * Complete any pending TLB or cache maintenance on this CPU in case
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-15 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 146+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-03 13:01 [PATCH v4 00/29] arm64: Permission Overlay Extension Joey Gouly
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 01/29] powerpc/mm: add ARCH_PKEY_BITS to Kconfig Joey Gouly
2024-05-06 8:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 02/29] x86/mm: " Joey Gouly
2024-05-03 16:40 ` Dave Hansen
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 03/29] mm: use ARCH_PKEY_BITS to define VM_PKEY_BITN Joey Gouly
2024-05-03 16:41 ` Dave Hansen
2024-07-15 7:53 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 04/29] arm64: disable trapping of POR_EL0 to EL2 Joey Gouly
2024-07-15 7:47 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-25 15:44 ` Dave Martin
2024-08-06 10:04 ` Joey Gouly
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 05/29] arm64: cpufeature: add Permission Overlay Extension cpucap Joey Gouly
2024-06-21 16:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-06-21 17:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-06-21 17:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-15 7:47 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 06/29] arm64: context switch POR_EL0 register Joey Gouly
2024-06-21 17:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-06-21 17:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-15 8:27 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2024-07-16 13:21 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-18 14:16 ` Joey Gouly
2024-07-22 13:40 ` Kevin Brodsky
2024-07-25 15:46 ` Dave Martin
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 07/29] KVM: arm64: Save/restore POE registers Joey Gouly
2024-05-29 15:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-08-16 14:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-08-16 15:13 ` Joey Gouly
2024-08-16 15:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 08/29] KVM: arm64: make kvm_at() take an OP_AT_* Joey Gouly
2024-05-29 15:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-07-15 8:36 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 09/29] KVM: arm64: use `at s1e1a` for POE Joey Gouly
2024-05-29 15:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-07-15 8:45 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 10/29] arm64: enable the Permission Overlay Extension for EL0 Joey Gouly
2024-06-21 17:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-15 9:13 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-15 20:16 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-25 15:49 ` Dave Martin
2024-08-01 16:04 ` Joey Gouly
2024-08-01 16:31 ` Dave Martin
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 11/29] arm64: re-order MTE VM_ flags Joey Gouly
2024-06-21 17:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-15 9:21 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 12/29] arm64: add POIndex defines Joey Gouly
2024-06-21 17:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-15 9:26 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 13/29] arm64: convert protection key into vm_flags and pgprot values Joey Gouly
2024-05-28 6:54 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2024-06-19 16:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-04 12:47 ` Joey Gouly
2024-07-08 17:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-16 9:05 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-16 9:34 ` Joey Gouly
2024-07-25 15:49 ` Dave Martin
2024-08-01 10:55 ` Joey Gouly
2024-08-01 11:01 ` Dave Martin
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 14/29] arm64: mask out POIndex when modifying a PTE Joey Gouly
2024-07-16 9:10 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 15/29] arm64: handle PKEY/POE faults Joey Gouly
2024-06-21 16:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-09 13:03 ` Kevin Brodsky
2024-07-16 10:13 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-25 15:57 ` Dave Martin
2024-08-01 16:01 ` Joey Gouly
2024-08-06 13:33 ` Dave Martin
2024-08-06 13:43 ` Joey Gouly
2024-08-06 14:38 ` Dave Martin
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 16/29] arm64: add pte_access_permitted_no_overlay() Joey Gouly
2024-06-21 17:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-16 10:21 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 17/29] arm64: implement PKEYS support Joey Gouly
2024-05-28 6:55 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2024-05-28 11:26 ` Joey Gouly
2024-05-31 14:57 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2024-05-31 15:21 ` Joey Gouly
2024-05-31 16:27 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2024-06-17 13:40 ` Florian Weimer
2024-06-17 14:51 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2024-07-08 17:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-09 8:32 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2024-07-09 8:52 ` Florian Weimer
2024-07-11 9:50 ` Joey Gouly
2024-07-18 14:45 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2024-07-05 16:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-22 13:39 ` Kevin Brodsky
2024-07-09 13:07 ` Kevin Brodsky
2024-07-16 11:40 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-23 4:22 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-25 16:12 ` Dave Martin
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 18/29] arm64: add POE signal support Joey Gouly
2024-05-28 6:56 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2024-05-31 16:39 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-03 9:21 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2024-07-25 15:58 ` Dave Martin
2024-07-25 18:11 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-26 16:14 ` Dave Martin
2024-07-26 17:39 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-29 14:27 ` Dave Martin
2024-07-29 14:41 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-05 17:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-09 13:08 ` Kevin Brodsky
2024-07-22 9:16 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-25 16:00 ` Dave Martin
2024-08-01 15:54 ` Joey Gouly
2024-08-01 16:22 ` Dave Martin
2024-08-06 10:35 ` Joey Gouly
2024-08-06 14:31 ` Joey Gouly
2024-08-06 15:00 ` Dave Martin
2024-08-14 15:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-15 13:18 ` Joey Gouly
2024-08-15 15:09 ` Dave Martin
2024-08-15 15:24 ` Mark Brown
2024-08-19 17:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-20 9:54 ` Joey Gouly
2024-08-20 13:54 ` Dave Martin
2024-08-20 14:06 ` Joey Gouly
2024-08-20 14:45 ` Dave Martin
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 19/29] arm64: enable PKEY support for CPUs with S1POE Joey Gouly
2024-07-16 10:47 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-25 15:48 ` Dave Martin
2024-07-25 16:00 ` Dave Martin
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 20/29] arm64: enable POE and PIE to coexist Joey Gouly
2024-06-21 17:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-16 10:41 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-07-16 13:46 ` Joey Gouly
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 21/29] arm64/ptrace: add support for FEAT_POE Joey Gouly
2024-07-16 10:35 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 22/29] arm64: add Permission Overlay Extension Kconfig Joey Gouly
2024-07-05 17:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-09 13:08 ` Kevin Brodsky
2024-07-16 11:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 23/29] kselftest/arm64: move get_header() Joey Gouly
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 24/29] selftests: mm: move fpregs printing Joey Gouly
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 25/29] selftests: mm: make protection_keys test work on arm64 Joey Gouly
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 26/29] kselftest/arm64: add HWCAP test for FEAT_S1POE Joey Gouly
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 27/29] kselftest/arm64: parse POE_MAGIC in a signal frame Joey Gouly
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 28/29] kselftest/arm64: Add test case for POR_EL0 signal frame records Joey Gouly
2024-05-29 15:51 ` Mark Brown
2024-07-05 19:34 ` Shuah Khan
2024-07-09 13:10 ` Kevin Brodsky
2024-05-03 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 29/29] KVM: selftests: get-reg-list: add Permission Overlay registers Joey Gouly
2024-05-05 14:41 ` [PATCH v4 00/29] arm64: Permission Overlay Extension Mark Brown
2024-05-28 11:30 ` Joey Gouly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3c655663-3407-4602-a958-c5382a6b3133@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox