From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E6AC433DF for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015512072D for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="MK1q9eNe" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 015512072D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5AAFE940009; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:41:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 55A6C900002; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:41:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 44B0F940009; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:41:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0129.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.129]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144D1900002 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:41:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin27.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D274181AE865 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:41:32 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77363536824.27.patch29_4c036ba271fb Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DACA3D668 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:41:32 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: patch29_4c036ba271fb X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 7693 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by imf15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09CEZDrw078166; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:41:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=Mh49I7jw4VB6kT4/ay+AaLZilzKCmLBonLwWNkMHRRw=; b=MK1q9eNePHSQkxW58VHmw9c51ABMDsasKexGHGtGFzfduqPUsqiEoLP3H2BW8pLNOJDY HKqx86fR6w5oclhuufWpcOEwP0GRox8JaBTYNny6OCAn7MCC4NOBYADXeh4lyftwVqJE sr8kULHlSgEXQMxanjk40vuI1bFSD2BIM9y2lsiAzCbBQg6f5qdB0j+hbWLabzpIGN5U bdFaxg4nw+BtjTue5U9eA2In51WVMjfyNcPxdiO7vm1Otcrw/GYBNtZXjnZIUa1xkmQk QBmsEy0lKB9GG3gZTFV4t6AdsGpBK0O3fAnbdeXBZ0quZUqnXFhalJ1jhEuBXpdVz/cX +w== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 344qucjbjf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:41:29 -0400 Received: from m0127361.ppops.net (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 09CEZWTT079650; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:41:28 -0400 Received: from ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (46.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.70]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 344qucjawm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:41:28 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09CEbR7V001812; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:39:34 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 344558rf3p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:39:34 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 09CEdVqO9437672 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:39:32 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0F8A405C; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:39:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052EAA405F; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:39:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.145.9.103] (unknown [9.145.9.103]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:39:30 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/17] s390/pci: Remove races against pte updates To: DRI Development , LKML , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Gerald Schaefer , Daniel Vetter , Jason Gunthorpe , Dan Williams , Kees Cook , Andrew Morton , John Hubbard , =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Jan Kara References: <20201009075934.3509076-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20201009075934.3509076-9-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <6deb08dd-46f3-bf26-5362-fdc696f6fd74@linux.ibm.com> <20201012141906.GX438822@phenom.ffwll.local> From: Niklas Schnelle Message-ID: <3c28a96a-6bb5-f581-4671-5c87161238f7@linux.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:39:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201012141906.GX438822@phenom.ffwll.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-10-12_12:2020-10-12,2020-10-12 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010120117 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: ... snip ... >>> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org >>> Cc: Niklas Schnelle >>> Cc: Gerald Schaefer >>> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org >>> -- >>> v2: Move VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP checks around so they keep returning EINVA= L >>> like before (Gerard) >> >> I think the above should go before the CC/Signed-off/Reviewev block. >=20 > This is a per-subsystem bikeshed :-) drivers/gpu definitely wants it > above, but most core subsystems want it below. I'll move it. Today I learned, thanks! That said I think most of the time I've actually not seen version change information in the commit message itself only in the cover letters. I really don't care just looked odd to me. >=20 >>> --- >>> arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------= -- >>> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c >>> index 401cf670a243..1a6adbc68ee8 100644 >>> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c >>> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c >>> @@ -119,33 +119,15 @@ static inline int __memcpy_toio_inuser(void __i= omem *dst, >>> return rc; >>> } >>> =20 >>> -static long get_pfn(unsigned long user_addr, unsigned long access, >>> - unsigned long *pfn) >>> -{ >>> - struct vm_area_struct *vma; >>> - long ret; >>> - >>> - mmap_read_lock(current->mm); >>> - ret =3D -EINVAL; >>> - vma =3D find_vma(current->mm, user_addr); >>> - if (!vma) >>> - goto out; >>> - ret =3D -EACCES; >>> - if (!(vma->vm_flags & access)) >>> - goto out; >>> - ret =3D follow_pfn(vma, user_addr, pfn); >>> -out: >>> - mmap_read_unlock(current->mm); >>> - return ret; >>> -} >>> - >>> SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_write, unsigned long, mmio_addr, >>> const void __user *, user_buffer, size_t, length) >>> { >>> u8 local_buf[64]; >>> void __iomem *io_addr; >>> void *buf; >>> - unsigned long pfn; >>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma; >>> + pte_t *ptep; >>> + spinlock_t *ptl; >> >> With checkpatch.pl --strict the above yields a complained >> "CHECK: spinlock_t definition without comment" but I think >> that's really okay since your commit description is very clear. >> Same oin line 277. >=20 > I think this is a falls positive, checkpatch doesn't realize that > SYSCALL_DEFINE3 is a function, not a structure. And in a structure I'd > have added the kerneldoc or comment. Interesting, your theory sounds convincing, I too thought this was a bit too pedantic. >=20 > I'll fix up all the nits you've found for the next round. Thanks for > taking a look. You're welcome hope I didn't sound pedantic. I think you've a lot more experience actually and this can indeed turn into bikeshedding but since I was answering anyway and most of this was checkpatch=E2=80=A6 > -Daniel >=20