From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, roman.fietze@magna.com,
keescook@chromium.org, john.ogness@linutronix.de,
akinobu.mita@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] lib/vsprintf: make-printk-non-secret printks all addresses as unhashed
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:59:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3baace45-38af-a59b-c376-9a4c39a17b2d@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202213633.755469-1-timur@kernel.org>
On 2/2/21 10:36 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> If the make-printk-non-secret command-line parameter is set, then
> printk("%p") will print addresses as unhashed. This is useful for
> debugging purposes.
>
> A large warning message is displayed if this option is enabled,
> because unhashed addresses, while useful for debugging, exposes
> kernel addresses which can be a security risk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org>
Thanks a lot. Should this also affect %pK though? IIUC, there's currently no way
to achieve non-mangled %pK in all cases, even with the most permissive
kptr_restrict=1 setting:
- in IRQ, there's "pK-error" instead
- in a context of non-CAP_SYSLOG process, nulls are printed
Yes, neither should matter if %pK were only used for prints that generate
content of some kind of /proc file read by a CAP_SYSLOG process, but that
doesn't seem to be the case and there are %pK used for printing to dmesg too...
> ---
> lib/vsprintf.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> index 3b53c73580c5..b9f87084afb0 100644
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -2090,6 +2090,30 @@ char *fwnode_string(char *buf, char *end, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> return widen_string(buf, buf - buf_start, end, spec);
> }
>
> +/* Disable pointer hashing if requested */
> +static bool debug_never_hash_pointers __ro_after_init;
> +
> +static int __init debug_never_hash_pointers_enable(char *str)
> +{
> + debug_never_hash_pointers = true;
> + pr_warn("**********************************************************\n");
> + pr_warn("** NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE **\n");
> + pr_warn("** **\n");
> + pr_warn("** All pointers that are printed to the console will **\n");
> + pr_warn("** be printed as unhashed. **\n");
> + pr_warn("** **\n");
> + pr_warn("** Kernel memory addresses are exposed, which may **\n");
> + pr_warn("** compromise security on your system. **\n");
> + pr_warn("** **\n");
> + pr_warn("** If you see this message and you are not debugging **\n");
> + pr_warn("** the kernel, report this immediately to your vendor! **\n");
> + pr_warn("** **\n");
> + pr_warn("** NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE **\n");
> + pr_warn("**********************************************************\n");
> + return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("make-printk-non-secret", debug_never_hash_pointers_enable);
> +
> /*
> * Show a '%p' thing. A kernel extension is that the '%p' is followed
> * by an extra set of alphanumeric characters that are extended format
> @@ -2297,8 +2321,14 @@ char *pointer(const char *fmt, char *buf, char *end, void *ptr,
> }
> }
>
> - /* default is to _not_ leak addresses, hash before printing */
> - return ptr_to_id(buf, end, ptr, spec);
> + /*
> + * default is to _not_ leak addresses, so hash before printing, unless
> + * make-printk-non-secret is specified on the command line.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(debug_never_hash_pointers))
> + return pointer_string(buf, end, ptr, spec);
> + else
> + return ptr_to_id(buf, end, ptr, spec);
> }
>
> /*
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-05 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-02 21:36 Timur Tabi
2021-02-03 3:24 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-02-03 3:30 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-02-03 9:54 ` Petr Mladek
2021-02-03 13:31 ` Petr Mladek
2021-02-03 18:58 ` Timur Tabi
2021-02-03 19:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-03 20:02 ` Kees Cook
2021-02-03 20:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-02-03 20:35 ` Kees Cook
2021-02-03 20:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-02-03 21:56 ` Timur Tabi
2021-02-03 22:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-02-04 9:36 ` Petr Mladek
2021-02-05 10:59 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2021-02-05 18:25 ` Timur Tabi
2021-02-10 0:24 ` Kees Cook
2021-02-09 21:59 ` Marco Elver
2021-02-09 22:15 ` Timur Tabi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3baace45-38af-a59b-c376-9a4c39a17b2d@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=roman.fietze@magna.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=timur@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox