linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers/base/node: merge register_one_node() and register_node() to a single function.
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 18:50:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ad7a1b6-eaba-4e1e-aa27-b6c9260ddc68@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0de65980-4333-434a-ae7d-2b7be46c2cca@redhat.com>


On 9/25/25 2:24 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 24.09.25 20:40, Donet Tom wrote:
>> register_one_node() and register_node() are small functions.
>> This patch merges them into a single function named register_node()
>> to improve code readability.
>>
>> No functional changes are introduced.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>>   /**
>>    * unregister_node - unregister a node device
>>    * @node: node going away
>> @@ -869,7 +842,13 @@ void 
>> register_memory_blocks_under_node_hotplug(int nid, unsigned long 
>> start_pfn,
>>   }
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
>>   -int register_one_node(int nid)
>> +/*
>
> We can directly convert this to proper kernel doc by using /**
>
Sure I will add it.


>
>> + * register_node - Setup a sysfs device for a node.
>> + * @nid - Node number to use when creating the device.
>> + *
>> + * Initialize and register the node device.
>
> and briefly describing what the return value means
>
> "Returns 0 on success, ..."
>
Sure

>> + */
>> +int register_node(int nid)
>>   {
>>       int error;
>>       int cpu;
>> @@ -880,14 +859,23 @@ int register_one_node(int nid)
>>           return -ENOMEM;
>>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->access_list);
>> -    node_devices[nid] = node;
>>   -    error = register_node(node_devices[nid], nid);
>> +    node->dev.id = nid;
>> +    node->dev.bus = &node_subsys;
>> +    node->dev.release = node_device_release;
>> +    node->dev.groups = node_dev_groups;
>> +
>> +    error = device_register(&node->dev);
>>       if (error) {
>> -        node_devices[nid] = NULL;
>
> Wondering why we did have this temporary setting of the node_devices[] 
> in there. But I cannot immediately spot why it was required.


node_devices[] is used in many places to access node data.

In the previous code, immediately after allocating the node

structure, it was stored in node_devices[]. On error paths, we

were clearing the node structure entry from node_devices[].


With the new code, the node structure is now stored in node_devices[]

only after the device has been registered, and just before calling

register_cpu_under_node(), since node_devices[] is accessed inside

that function.


It is also used outside of node.c, in hugetlb_register_all_nodes() .

Do you think we could use a different mechanism instead of this?



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-25 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-24 18:40 [PATCH 0/2] drivers/base/node: fold node register and unregister functions Donet Tom
2025-09-24 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] drivers/base/node: merge register_one_node() and register_node() to a single function Donet Tom
2025-09-24 19:15   ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-25  5:01     ` Donet Tom
2025-09-25  8:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25  9:34     ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-25  9:37       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25 13:21       ` Donet Tom
2025-09-25 13:20     ` Donet Tom [this message]
2025-09-24 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] drivers/base/node: merge unregister_one_node() and unregister_node() " Donet Tom
2025-09-24 19:19   ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-25  5:03     ` Donet Tom
2025-09-25  8:55   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25  9:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] drivers/base/node: fold node register and unregister functions Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3ad7a1b6-eaba-4e1e-aa27-b6c9260ddc68@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox