From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
muchun.song@linux.dev, david@redhat.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
baohua@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] mm: thp: reparent the split queue during memcg offline
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 14:21:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3acbf7df-b890-4679-bbbe-959bd45fdef3@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aPcjnKAapap5jrK-@hyeyoo>
On 10/21/25 2:09 PM, Harry Yoo wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 02:35:33PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
>> From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
>>
>> Similar to list_lru, the split queue is relatively independent and does
>> not need to be reparented along with objcg and LRU folios (holding
>> objcg lock and lru lock). So let's apply the similar mechanism as list_lru
>> to reparent the split queue separately when memcg is offine.
>>
>> This is also a preparation for reparenting LRU folios.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
>> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
>> ---
>
> Looks good to me,
> Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Thanks.
>
> with a question:
>
>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> index e850bc10da3e2..9323039418201 100644
>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> @@ -1117,8 +1117,19 @@ static struct deferred_split *split_queue_lock(int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg
>> {
>> struct deferred_split *queue;
>>
>> +retry:
>> queue = memcg_split_queue(nid, memcg);
>> spin_lock(&queue->split_queue_lock);
>> + /*
>> + * There is a period between setting memcg to dying and reparenting
>> + * deferred split queue, and during this period the THPs in the deferred
>> + * split queue will be hidden from the shrinker side.
>> + */
>
> You mean it will be hidden if the shrinker bit is not set for the node
> in the parent memcg, right?
Look at the following situation:
CPU 0 CPU 1
----- -----
set CSS_DYING
deferred_split_scan
/*
* See CSS_DYING, and return the parent
* memcg's ds_queue. But the pages on the
* child memcg's ds_queue has not yet been
* reparented to the parent memcg, that is,
* it is hidden.
*/
--> ds_queue = split_queue_lock_irqsave()
reparent_deferred_split_queue
Thanks,
Qi
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-21 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 6:35 [PATCH v5 0/4] reparent the THP split queue Qi Zheng
2025-10-15 6:35 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] mm: thp: replace folio_memcg() with folio_memcg_charged() Qi Zheng
2025-10-15 6:35 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] mm: thp: introduce folio_split_queue_lock and its variants Qi Zheng
2025-10-15 6:35 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] mm: thp: use folio_batch to handle THP splitting in deferred_split_scan() Qi Zheng
2025-10-17 0:46 ` Wei Yang
2025-10-17 2:33 ` Qi Zheng
2025-10-17 5:38 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-06 14:52 ` Wei Yang
2025-11-07 2:29 ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-07 2:52 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-07 2:51 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-07 2:59 ` Wei Yang
2025-10-15 6:35 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] mm: thp: reparent the split queue during memcg offline Qi Zheng
2025-10-21 6:09 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-21 6:21 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2025-10-21 9:29 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-21 9:43 ` Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3acbf7df-b890-4679-bbbe-959bd45fdef3@linux.dev \
--to=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox