From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so375698pyh for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3aa654a40707120535g7d1b73uf5c73ef68a1cd98a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:35:24 -0700 From: "Avuton Olrich" Subject: Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 In-Reply-To: <367a23780707120506o423f6352h5edeca8535135068@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070710013152.ef2cd200.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200707102015.44004.kernel@kolivas.org> <20070710181419.6d1b2f7e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <367a23780707120506o423f6352h5edeca8535135068@mail.gmail.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Kacper Wysocki Cc: Andrew Morton , Matthew Hawkins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Con Kolivas , ck list , linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Jackson List-ID: On 7/12/07, Kacper Wysocki wrote: > performance, testing and impact. The big question is: why *don't* we > merge it? Stranger thing to me is that this is like Deja Vu. Many have asked this same question. When users were asked for their comment before many end users and some developers have given rave reviews. I don't remember anyone giving it the heavy thumbs-down, with exception of when things needed fixing (over 6 months ago?). It continues to go unmerged. Is there a clear answer on what needs to happen for it to get merged? -- avuton -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org