Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 03:03:15PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
>>ptes this time
> > Isn't pte_to_pfn a better name?  index doesn't have a type of data 
> implied, whereas pfn does.  We have to make these distinctions clearer 
> as work like William's PAGE_SIZE is being done.

Works for me.  Here's an updated patch.

-- 
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com