From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
To: Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
Alex Bligh - linux-kernel <linux-kernel@alex.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.59-mm5
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 03:00:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E31630E.7070601@cyberone.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15921.11824.472374.112916@laputa.namesys.com>
Nikita Danilov wrote:
>Andrew Morton writes:
>
>[...]
>
> >
> > In this very common scenario, the only way we'll ever get "lumps" of reads is
> > if some other processes come in and happen to want to read nearby sectors.
>
>Or if you have read-ahead for meta-data, which is quite useful. Isn't
>read ahead targeting the same problem as this anticipatory scheduling?
>
Finesse vs brute force. A bit of readahead is good.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-24 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-24 3:50 2.5.59-mm5 Andrew Morton
2003-01-24 11:03 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2003-01-24 11:16 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Andrew Morton
2003-01-24 11:23 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Alex Tomas
2003-01-24 11:50 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Andrew Morton
2003-01-24 12:05 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Alex Tomas
2003-01-24 19:12 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Andrew Morton
2003-01-24 19:58 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Alex Tomas
2003-01-25 17:32 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Ed Tomlinson
2003-01-25 17:41 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Andrew Morton
2003-01-25 20:34 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Ed Tomlinson
2003-01-25 22:33 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Andrew Morton
2003-01-26 1:43 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Ed Tomlinson
2003-01-26 2:17 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Andrew Morton
2003-01-26 3:51 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Ed Tomlinson
2003-01-26 4:04 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Andrew Morton
2003-01-24 15:56 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Oliver Xymoron
2003-01-24 16:04 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Nick Piggin
2003-01-24 17:09 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Giuliano Pochini
2003-01-24 17:22 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Nick Piggin
2003-01-24 19:34 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-24 20:04 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Jens Axboe
2003-01-24 22:02 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-25 12:28 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Jens Axboe
2003-01-24 12:14 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Nikita Danilov
2003-01-24 16:00 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2003-01-24 11:23 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Jens Axboe
2003-01-24 13:59 ` 2.5.59-mm5 got stuck during boot Helge Hafting
2003-01-24 17:44 ` Ed Tomlinson
2003-01-24 17:56 ` Nick Piggin
2003-01-24 19:18 ` Ed Tomlinson
2003-01-25 8:33 ` 2.5.59-mm5 Andres Salomon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E31630E.7070601@cyberone.com.au \
--to=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=Nikita@Namesys.COM \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@alex.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox