From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from digeo-nav01.digeo.com (digeo-nav01.digeo.com [192.168.1.233]) by packet.digeo.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA10161 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 00:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3DBB9699.4F07BA71@digeo.com> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 00:32:41 -0700 From: Andrew Morton MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: 2.5.42-mm2 References: <3DA7C3A5.98FCC13E@digeo.com> <20021013101949.GB2032@holomorphy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: William Lee Irwin III Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" List-ID: William Lee Irwin III wrote: > > This patch does 5 things: > > (1) when the OOM killer fails and the system panics, calls > show_free_areas() > (2) reorganizes show_free_areas() to use for_each_zone() > (3) adds per-cpu stats to show_free_areas() > (4) tags output from show_free_areas() with node and zone information > (5) initializes zone->per_cpu_pageset[cpu].pcp[temperature].reserved > in free_area_init_core() hm. I just ran out of swap and got oom-killed. Would it make sense to call show_free_areas() for _all_ oom-killings? I think so. At least during the development cycle. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/