From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
Saurabh Desai <sdesai@austin.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
NPT library mailing list <phil-list@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] mmap-speedup-2.5.42-C3
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:09:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DAC59F7.18678FA6@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210151438440.10496-100000@localhost.localdomain>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Saurabh reported a slowdown after the first couple of thousands of
> threads, which i can reproduce as well. The reason for this slowdown is
> the get_unmapped_area() implementation, which tries to achieve the most
> compact virtual memory allocation, by searching for the vma at
> TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE, and then linearly searching for a hole. With thousands
> of linearly allocated vmas this is an increasingly painful thing to do ...
We've had reports of problems with that linear search before - for
a single-threaded application which was mapping a lot of little windows
into a huge file.
> ...
>
> there are various solutions to this problem, none of which solve the
> problem in a 100% sufficient way, so i went for the simplest approach: i
> added code to cache the 'last known hole' address in mm->free_area_cache,
> which is used as a hint to get_unmapped_area().
This will have no effect on current kernel behaviour other than speeding
it up. Looks good.
> ...
> The most generic and still perfectly-compact VM allocation solution would
> be to have a vma tree for the 'inverse virtual memory space', ie. a tree
> of free virtual memory ranges, which could be searched and iterated like
> the space of allocated vmas. I think we could do this by extending vmas,
> but the drawback is larger vmas. This does not save us from having to scan
> vmas linearly still, because the size constraint is still present, but at
> least most of the anon-mmap activities are constant sized. (both malloc()
> and the thread-stack allocator uses mostly fixed sizes.)
Yup. We'd need to be able to perform a search based on "size of hole"
rather than virtual address. That really needs a whole new data structure
and supporting search code, I think... It also may have side effects
to do with fragmentation of the virtual address space.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-15 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-15 13:11 Ingo Molnar
2002-10-15 18:09 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-10-16 1:14 ` Saurabh Desai
2002-10-16 8:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-16 14:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-16 15:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-16 16:10 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DAC59F7.18678FA6@digeo.com \
--to=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=phil-list@redhat.com \
--cc=sdesai@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox